37
By repeating the same material with small variations, Larsen is mirroring the way
the original song would be performed. The melodies of the A and B sections are made up
ofborrowed material, but a short C section added midway through the piece contains all
original material. This short melody was created as a “classical answer”65 to the
Gringalet tune, added by the composer for variation in the later part of the piece.
Second Movement: French Blues
Larsen chose a song titled French Blues as the source material for the second
movement of Cajun Set. She notes that this song “is a slow, sensuous tune, preferably
performed a cappella in the parlando style.”66 The only information that Whitfield
provides with her transcription is that her source was an Alan Lomax recording.67 The
song itself is quite simple: it is sixteen measures long, in d dorian, and in triple meter.
The fourth line repeats the melody of the third.
Example 1.7: French Blues
Andantino.
⅜» √b√ I j Ju-j jυ∣ ^∙j j I j Λ≠ι J J JI ш IJ j⅜ι
Je m'en - dors, je mjen ∙ dors, et j'ai soif et j'ai faim. Le so - Ieil est cou - ché tu viens loin déjà mai-
⅜ j Д..М J j I M-M J j jl j J J jU -M J j jl j Ii
son. Qu'a-vez - vous, oui, belle blonde? Qu'a-vez • vous, oui, belle brune? Cest tout pour la blonde et rien pour la brune.
Libby Larsen, interview with the author, phone transcript, 3 December 2009.
66 Larsen, Cajun Set, preface.
67
Ethnomusicologists Alan Lomax (1915-2002) and his father, John (1867-1948)
collected, transcribed, and recorded American folk songs. Their work aided and inspired
Whitfield’s study OfLouisiana French Folk Songs.
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Midwest prospects and the new economy
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Structural Influences on Participation Rates: A Canada-U.S. Comparison
6. Nurses' retention and hospital characteristics in New South Wales, CHERE Discussion Paper No 52
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Models of Cognition: Neurological possibility does not indicate neurological plausibility.
10. Økonomisk teorihistorie - Overflødig information eller brugbar ballast?