A Note on Costly Sequential Search and Oligopoly Pricing (new title: Truly Costly Sequential Search and Oligopolistic Pricing,)



Inspection of (5) and (9) implies that ρ < v. It is useful to rewrite condition (9) as

1 _ [1____dy____> c.

(10)


0o 1 + bNyN-1 v

This equation gives the set of parameters for which an equilibrium where buyers search once for
sure exists. For future reference, let us denote the left-hand-side of equation (10) as Φ(1;
μ; N).4
We note that 0 < Φ(1; μ; N) < 1 for all values of the parameters.

Proposition 1 Let 0 v Φ(1; μ, N). Then a search equilibrium with full consumer participation
exists where buyers search for one price and firms charge prices from the set
[(1 _ μ)ρ/(μN + (1 _
μ
))] according to the price distribution (3) where p = ρ and ρ solves equation (8).

From (5) and (9) and the continuity of the expression of the expected price, it follows that
the reservation price
ρ converges to v when c/v approaches Φ(1; μ, N). The question then arises
what happens when search costs are high, in particular when
C > Φ(1; μ,N)? In what follows we
show that an equilibrium with partial consumer participation arises. This equilibrium is new in
the sequential search literature and its properties are interesting.

Case b: Equilibrium with partial consumer participation

Now assume that non-shoppers randomize between searching for one price quotation and not search-
ing at all, i.e.,
θ0 > 0, θ0 + θ1 = 1. The expected payoff to firm i is

i(Pi, F(Pi)) = Pi (1 N)θ1 + μ(1 _ F(Pi))N 1

(11)


The economic interpretation of equation (11) is analogous to that of equation (1), except that there
are now (1
_ μ)θ 1 non-shoppers active, rather than 1 _ μ. A similar analysis as above yields the
following equilibrium price distribution:
with support [
p,p] where p = (1 _ μ)θ 1 p/(μN + (1 _ μ)θ 1). We now notice that the upper bound is
no longer equal to
ρ, but equal to v . To see this, note that non-shoppers should now be indifferent

F(P) = 1 _


μθι(1 _ μ)(p _ p) *-1

N Νμp J ,


(12)


4The number 1 in the arguments of Φ(∙) stands for θ 1=1.



More intriguing information

1. Competition In or For the Field: Which is Better
2. Commitment devices, opportunity windows, and institution building in Central Asia
3. ISSUES AND PROBLEMS OF IMMEDIATE CONCERN
4. EU enlargement and environmental policy
5. Income Mobility of Owners of Small Businesses when Boundaries between Occupations are Vague
6. The name is absent
7. A Consistent Nonparametric Test for Causality in Quantile
8. Problems of operationalizing the concept of a cost-of-living index
9. The name is absent
10. The Impact of Cognitive versus Affective Aspects on Consumer Usage of Financial Service Delivery Channels