4.2 Productivity shock
In Figure 2, the impulse response functions of aggregate variables to a technology shock
εz,2 = 1 in period 2 (and zero thereafter) are presented. In the first row, the percent-
age deviations of the variables technology level zt , output Yt , consumption Ct , and
investment It are graphed, in the second row, we illustrate the percentage deviations
of effective labor input Nt and working hours (the dotted line), capital Kt, real money
mt , and the inflation factor πt , while in the third row, you find the behavior of marginal
costs gt (the inverse of the mark-up), profits Ωt, the real interest rt, and the wage rate
wt.
Figure 2
Technology Shock in the OLG Model





_________ |

Following an unexpected increase of the technology level by 1%, output increases by
1.0% as well. On impact, effective labor input increases slightly whereas working hours
decrease. Subsequently both effective labor input and hours decrease. This result stems
17
More intriguing information
1. THE MEXICAN HOG INDUSTRY: MOVING BEYOND 20032. The Tangible Contribution of R&D Spending Foreign-Owned Plants to a Host Region: a Plant Level Study of the Irish Manufacturing Sector (1980-1996)
3. Inhimillinen pääoma ja palkat Suomessa: Paluu perusmalliin
4. Business Cycle Dynamics of a New Keynesian Overlapping Generations Model with Progressive Income Taxation
5. Philosophical Perspectives on Trustworthiness and Open-mindedness as Professional Virtues for the Practice of Nursing: Implications for he Moral Education of Nurses
6. An Attempt to 2
7. DISCUSSION: POLICY CONSIDERATIONS OF EMERGING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
8. Nach der Einführung von Arbeitslosengeld II: deutlich mehr Verlierer als Gewinner unter den Hilfeempfängern
9. The name is absent
10. Nurses' retention and hospital characteristics in New South Wales, CHERE Discussion Paper No 52