4.2 Productivity shock
In Figure 2, the impulse response functions of aggregate variables to a technology shock
εz,2 = 1 in period 2 (and zero thereafter) are presented. In the first row, the percent-
age deviations of the variables technology level zt , output Yt , consumption Ct , and
investment It are graphed, in the second row, we illustrate the percentage deviations
of effective labor input Nt and working hours (the dotted line), capital Kt, real money
mt , and the inflation factor πt , while in the third row, you find the behavior of marginal
costs gt (the inverse of the mark-up), profits Ωt, the real interest rt, and the wage rate
wt.
Figure 2
Technology Shock in the OLG Model





_________ |

Following an unexpected increase of the technology level by 1%, output increases by
1.0% as well. On impact, effective labor input increases slightly whereas working hours
decrease. Subsequently both effective labor input and hours decrease. This result stems
17
More intriguing information
1. The Modified- Classroom ObservationScheduletoMeasureIntenticnaCommunication( M-COSMIC): EvaluationofReliabilityandValidity2. Reconsidering the value of pupil attitudes to studying post-16: a caution for Paul Croll
3. The name is absent
4. Improvements in medical care and technology and reductions in traffic-related fatalities in Great Britain
5. Evaluation of the Development Potential of Russian Cities
6. Improving the Impact of Market Reform on Agricultural Productivity in Africa: How Institutional Design Makes a Difference
7. Strategic Planning on the Local Level As a Factor of Rural Development in the Republic of Serbia
8. The name is absent
9. Human Rights Violations by the Executive: Complicity of the Judiciary in Cameroon?
10. The name is absent