4.2 Productivity shock
In Figure 2, the impulse response functions of aggregate variables to a technology shock
εz,2 = 1 in period 2 (and zero thereafter) are presented. In the first row, the percent-
age deviations of the variables technology level zt , output Yt , consumption Ct , and
investment It are graphed, in the second row, we illustrate the percentage deviations
of effective labor input Nt and working hours (the dotted line), capital Kt, real money
mt , and the inflation factor πt , while in the third row, you find the behavior of marginal
costs gt (the inverse of the mark-up), profits Ωt, the real interest rt, and the wage rate
wt.
Figure 2
Technology Shock in the OLG Model





_________ |

Following an unexpected increase of the technology level by 1%, output increases by
1.0% as well. On impact, effective labor input increases slightly whereas working hours
decrease. Subsequently both effective labor input and hours decrease. This result stems
17
More intriguing information
1. School Effectiveness in Developing Countries - A Summary of the Research Evidence2. Pricing American-style Derivatives under the Heston Model Dynamics: A Fast Fourier Transformation in the Geske–Johnson Scheme
3. DEMAND FOR MEAT AND FISH PRODUCTS IN KOREA
4. The name is absent
5. A Principal Components Approach to Cross-Section Dependence in Panels
6. Herman Melville and the Problem of Evil
7. ISSUES AND PROBLEMS OF IMMEDIATE CONCERN
8. The name is absent
9. Impacts of Tourism and Fiscal Expenditure on Remote Islands in Japan: A Panel Data Analysis
10. How do investors' expectations drive asset prices?