22
Literature Cited
Amacher, G.S. 1999. Government Preferences and Public Harvesting. A Second-Best
Approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81, 14-28.
Atkinson, A. and J. Stiglitz.1980. Lectures on Public Economics. McGraw Hill, New
York.
Bowes, M.and J. Krutilla. 1989. Multiple-Use Management: The Economics of Publi
Forests. Washington D.C., Resources for the Future.
Bowes, M.and J.Krutilla. 1985. Multiple-Use Management of Public Forestlands. In
Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics, vol. II. Kneese, A.and
Sweeney, J. (eds.). North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Calish, S., R. Fight and D.Teeguarden 1978. How Do Nontimber Values Affect
Douglas-fir Rotations? Journal of Forestry, 76, 217-221.
Chipman, J. 1977. An Empirical Implication of Auspitz-Lieben-Edgeworth-Pareto
Complementarity. Journal of Economic Theory, 14, 228-231.
Hartman, R. 1976. The Harvesting Decision When a Standing Forest Has Value.
Economic Inquiry 14, 52-58.
Johansson, P-O. and K-G. Lofgren 1985. Economics of Forestry and Natural
Resources. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
Johansson, P-O. and K-G. Lofgren (1988): Where’s the Beef? A Reply to Price?
Journal ofEnvironmental Management 27, 337-339.
Kannai, Y.1980. The ALEP Definition of Complementarity and Least Concave
Utility Functions. Journal ofEconomic Theory 22, 115-117.
Koskela, E. and M. Ollikainen. 1999. Optimal Public Harvesting under the
Interdependence of Public and Private Forests. Forest Science 45, 259-271.
Koskela, E. and M. Ollikainen. 2000. Forest Taxation and Rotation Age under
Private Amenity Valuation: New Results. Forthcoming in Journal of
Environmental Economics and Management. Downloadable in:
http://www.valt.helsinki.fi/raka/erkki.htm
Persson, T. and G. Tabellini. 1990. Macroeconomic Policy, Credibility and
Politics, Harwood Academic Publishers, New York.
Samuelson, P. 1974. Complementarity. An Essay on the 40th Anniversary of the
Hicks-Allen Revolution in Demand Theory. Journal ofEconomic Literature
12, 1255-1289.
Snyder, D. and R. Bhattacharyya 1990. A More General Dynamic Economic Model
of the Optimal Rotation of Multiple-Use Forests. Journal of Environmental
Economics and Management 18, 168-175.
Strang, W. 1983. On the Optimal Forest Harvesting Decision. Economic Inquiry 21,
576-583.
Swallow, S., P. Parks and D. Wear 1990. Policy Relevant Nonconvexities in the
Production of Multiple Forest Benefits. Journal ofEnvironmental
Economics and Management 19, 264-280.
Swallow, S., P. Talukdar, and D.Wear. 1997. Spatial and Temporal Specialization in
Forest Ecosystem Management under Sole Ownership. American Journal of
Agricultural Economics 79, 311-326.
Swallow, S. and D. Wear. 1993. Spatial Interactions in Multiple-Use Forestry and
Substitution and Wealth Effects for the Single Stand. Journal of
Environmental Economics and Management 25, 103-120.
Vincent, J. and C. Binkley 1993. Efficient Multiple-Use Forestry May Require
Land-Use Specialization. Land Economics 69, 370-376.
More intriguing information
1. Centre for Longitudinal Studies2. Plasmid-Encoded Multidrug Resistance of Salmonella typhi and some Enteric Bacteria in and around Kolkata, India: A Preliminary Study
3. EMU's Decentralized System of Fiscal Policy
4. Structure and objectives of Austria's foreign direct investment in the four adjacent Central and Eastern European countries Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Slovakia
5. THE WAEA -- WHICH NICHE IN THE PROFESSION?
6. Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 11
7. The name is absent
8. Modelling Transport in an Interregional General Equilibrium Model with Externalities
9. Types of Cost in Inductive Concept Learning
10. Deprivation Analysis in Declining Inner City Residential Areas: A Case Study From Izmir, Turkey.