Optimal Private and Public Harvesting under Spatial and Temporal Interdependence



22

Literature Cited

Amacher, G.S. 1999. Government Preferences and Public Harvesting. A Second-Best
Approach.
American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81, 14-28.

Atkinson, A. and J. Stiglitz.1980. Lectures on Public Economics. McGraw Hill, New
York.

Bowes, M.and J. Krutilla. 1989. Multiple-Use Management: The Economics of Publi
Forests.
Washington D.C., Resources for the Future.

Bowes, M.and J.Krutilla. 1985. Multiple-Use Management of Public Forestlands. In
Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics, vol. II. Kneese, A.and
Sweeney, J. (eds.). North-Holland, Amsterdam.

Calish, S., R. Fight and D.Teeguarden 1978. How Do Nontimber Values Affect
Douglas-fir Rotations?
Journal of Forestry, 76, 217-221.

Chipman, J. 1977. An Empirical Implication of Auspitz-Lieben-Edgeworth-Pareto
Complementarity.
Journal of Economic Theory, 14, 228-231.

Hartman, R. 1976. The Harvesting Decision When a Standing Forest Has Value.
Economic Inquiry 14, 52-58.

Johansson, P-O. and K-G. Lofgren 1985. Economics of Forestry and Natural
Resources
. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.

Johansson, P-O. and K-G. Lofgren (1988): Where’s the Beef? A Reply to Price?
Journal ofEnvironmental Management 27, 337-339.

Kannai, Y.1980. The ALEP Definition of Complementarity and Least Concave
Utility Functions.
Journal ofEconomic Theory 22, 115-117.

Koskela, E. and M. Ollikainen. 1999. Optimal Public Harvesting under the
Interdependence of Public and Private Forests.
Forest Science 45, 259-271.

Koskela, E. and M. Ollikainen. 2000. Forest Taxation and Rotation Age under
Private Amenity Valuation: New Results. Forthcoming in
Journal of
Environmental Economics and Management.
Downloadable in:
http://www.valt.helsinki.fi/raka/erkki.htm

Persson, T. and G. Tabellini. 1990. Macroeconomic Policy, Credibility and
Politics
, Harwood Academic Publishers, New York.

Samuelson, P. 1974. Complementarity. An Essay on the 40th Anniversary of the
Hicks-Allen Revolution in Demand Theory.
Journal ofEconomic Literature
12, 1255-1289.

Snyder, D. and R. Bhattacharyya 1990. A More General Dynamic Economic Model
of the Optimal Rotation of Multiple-Use Forests.
Journal of Environmental
Economics and Management
18, 168-175.

Strang, W. 1983. On the Optimal Forest Harvesting Decision. Economic Inquiry 21,
576-583.

Swallow, S., P. Parks and D. Wear 1990. Policy Relevant Nonconvexities in the
Production of Multiple Forest Benefits.
Journal ofEnvironmental
Economics and Management
19, 264-280.

Swallow, S., P. Talukdar, and D.Wear. 1997. Spatial and Temporal Specialization in
Forest Ecosystem Management under Sole Ownership.
American Journal of
Agricultural Economics
79, 311-326.

Swallow, S. and D. Wear. 1993. Spatial Interactions in Multiple-Use Forestry and
Substitution and Wealth Effects for the Single Stand.
Journal of
Environmental Economics and Management
25, 103-120.

Vincent, J. and C. Binkley 1993. Efficient Multiple-Use Forestry May Require
Land-Use Specialization.
Land Economics 69, 370-376.



More intriguing information

1. AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF THE COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL PROGRAM
2. The name is absent
3. Elicited bid functions in (a)symmetric first-price auctions
4. National curriculum assessment: how to make it better
5. The name is absent
6. Tourism in Rural Areas and Regional Development Planning
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Assessing Economic Complexity with Input-Output Based Measures
10. An alternative way to model merit good arguments
11. Are Japanese bureaucrats politically stronger than farmers?: The political economy of Japan's rice set-aside program
12. Restructuring of industrial economies in countries in transition: Experience of Ukraine
13. Automatic Dream Sentiment Analysis
14. Imperfect competition and congestion in the City
15. Needing to be ‘in the know’: strategies of subordination used by 10-11 year old school boys
16. WP 36 - Women's Preferences or Delineated Policies? The development or part-time work in the Netherlands, Germany and the United Kingdom
17. The name is absent
18. The name is absent
19. Urban Green Space Policies: Performance and Success Conditions in European Cities
20. Conditions for learning: partnerships for engaging secondary pupils with contemporary art.