|
Reaction of M |
Reaction of IN |
Reaction of A |
Reaction of T |
Reaction of TR |
Reaction of S |
|
to a shock in EC |
to a shock in EC |
to a shock in EC |
to a shock in EC |
to a shock in EC |
to a shock in EC |
Figure 6: Impulse Responses for Sectoral Output and Equity Capital with Cholesky Decomposition
Note: The solid lines trace the impulse responses of the sectoral output of mining (M), industry (IN), agriculture (A), trade (T), trans-
portation (TR) and services (S) to a shock in equity capital (EC) for the years 1870 to 1912.
4 A sectoral analysis
Table I: Variance Decomposition for Sectoral Output and Equity Capital
|
Period |
M due to EC |
IN due to EC |
A due to EC |
T due to EC |
TR due to EC |
S due to EC |
|
^^5 |
0.670 |
20.532 |
16.207 |
23.426 |
3.594 |
5.202 |
|
[3.026] |
[13.086] |
[9.637] |
[15.464] |
[5.668] |
[7.061] | |
|
10 |
0.852 |
24.775 |
26.664 |
20.462 |
2.272 |
11.091 |
|
[6.767] |
[20.563] |
[13.019] |
[17.772] |
[5.561] |
[10.762] |
Note: The variance decomposition (in percent) is shown for the sectoral output of mining (M), industry
(IN), agriculture (A), trade (T), transportation (TR) and services (S). The figures show the share of the
forecast error variance that is due to a shock in equity capital.
More intriguing information
1. Modelling the health related benefits of environmental policies - a CGE analysis for the eu countries with gem-e32. The name is absent
3. For Whom is MAI? A theoretical Perspective on Multilateral Agreements on Investments
4. News Not Noise: Socially Aware Information Filtering
5. Credit Market Competition and Capital Regulation
6. The Macroeconomic Determinants of Volatility in Precious Metals Markets
7. The name is absent
8. HOW WILL PRODUCTION, MARKETING, AND CONSUMPTION BE COORDINATED? FROM A FARM ORGANIZATION VIEWPOINT
9. Strategic Effects and Incentives in Multi-issue Bargaining Games
10. On Dictatorship, Economic Development and Stability