Reaction of M |
Reaction of IN |
Reaction of A |
Reaction of T |
Reaction of TR |
Reaction of S |
to a shock in EC |
to a shock in EC |
to a shock in EC |
to a shock in EC |
to a shock in EC |
to a shock in EC |
Figure 6: Impulse Responses for Sectoral Output and Equity Capital with Cholesky Decomposition

Note: The solid lines trace the impulse responses of the sectoral output of mining (M), industry (IN), agriculture (A), trade (T), trans-
portation (TR) and services (S) to a shock in equity capital (EC) for the years 1870 to 1912.
4 A sectoral analysis
Table I: Variance Decomposition for Sectoral Output and Equity Capital
Period |
M due to EC |
IN due to EC |
A due to EC |
T due to EC |
TR due to EC |
S due to EC |
^^5 |
0.670 |
20.532 |
16.207 |
23.426 |
3.594 |
5.202 |
[3.026] |
[13.086] |
[9.637] |
[15.464] |
[5.668] |
[7.061] | |
10 |
0.852 |
24.775 |
26.664 |
20.462 |
2.272 |
11.091 |
[6.767] |
[20.563] |
[13.019] |
[17.772] |
[5.561] |
[10.762] |
Note: The variance decomposition (in percent) is shown for the sectoral output of mining (M), industry
(IN), agriculture (A), trade (T), transportation (TR) and services (S). The figures show the share of the
forecast error variance that is due to a shock in equity capital.
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Revisiting The Bell Curve Debate Regarding the Effects of Cognitive Ability on Wages
3. The Prohibition of the Proposed Springer-ProSiebenSat.1-Merger: How much Economics in German Merger Control?
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. AGRICULTURAL TRADE LIBERALIZATION UNDER NAFTA: REPORTING ON THE REPORT CARD
7. Luce Irigaray and divine matter
8. Une Gestion des ressources humaines à l'interface des organisations : vers une GRH territoriale ?
9. APPLICATIONS OF DUALITY THEORY TO AGRICULTURE
10. The name is absent