Inflation Targeting and Nonlinear Policy Rules: The Case of Asymmetric Preferences (new title: The Fed's monetary policy rule and U.S. inflation: The case of asymmetric preferences)



Table 5: Structural Estimates

- alternative normalization of the orthogonality conditions -

1960:1 - 1979:2             1982:4 2003:2

c1

0.79*                         3.64**

(0.08)                            (0.77)

c2

1.11**                          1.08**

(0.06)                            (0.03)

c3

0.01                              0.53

(0.02)                            (0.40)

c4

-0.17**                          -0.04

(0.01)                            (0.05)

ρ

0.65**                         0.90**

(0.02)                            (0.02)

i*

5.4                               6.0

π*

4.1                               2.5

α

0.03                             0.29

(0.04)                            (0.22)

γ

-0.31**                          -0.06

(0.02)                            (0.10)

t-type statistics
p-value

W(2) p-value

J(19) p-value

.000                            .000

.000                              .423

__________.949_____________________________.876______________

Specification:

E,-11- μ i - i * )+(1- ρ )( λ (πt -π )+y,+αλ (πt -π * )2+^2 y2}+pρi,1 - i * ) zt-11=0
Notes: This table reports the nonlinear GMM estimates of the structural parameters α and
γ. The estimates of the reduced-form coefficients are recovered from the estimates of the
structural parameters while the standard errors are computed using the delta method.
Inflation, output gap and the instrument set z
t-1 correspond to the baseline measures
described in the notes to Table 1. The t-type test refers to the null hypothesis (
μZλφ) =0.
W(n) refers to the Wald statistics of the test for n parameter restrictions, which is
distributed as a
χ2(n) under the joint null hypothesis α=γ=0. J(m) refers to the statistics of
Hansen’s test for
m overidentifying restrictions which is distributed as a χ2(m) under the
null hypothesis of valid overidentifying restrictions. The superscript ** and * denote the
rejection of the null hypothesis that the true coefficient is zero at the 1 percent and 5
percent significance levels, respectively.

26



More intriguing information

1. Comparative study of hatching rates of African catfish (Clarias gariepinus Burchell 1822) eggs on different substrates
2. Spatial patterns in intermunicipal Danish commuting
3. The name is absent
4. Government spending composition, technical change and wage inequality
5. How does an infant acquire the ability of joint attention?: A Constructive Approach
6. Bird’s Eye View to Indonesian Mass Conflict Revisiting the Fact of Self-Organized Criticality
7. Rent-Seeking in Noxious Weed Regulations: Evidence from US States
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. The Modified- Classroom ObservationScheduletoMeasureIntenticnaCommunication( M-COSMIC): EvaluationofReliabilityandValidity
11. Word searches: on the use of verbal and non-verbal resources during classroom talk
12. The name is absent
13. The name is absent
14. The name is absent
15. The name is absent
16. Geography, Health, and Demo-Economic Development
17. The name is absent
18. ARE VOLATILITY EXPECTATIONS CHARACTERIZED BY REGIME SHIFTS? EVIDENCE FROM IMPLIED VOLATILITY INDICES
19. Wage mobility, Job mobility and Spatial mobility in the Portuguese economy
20. Labour Market Flexibility and Regional Unemployment Rate Dynamics: Spain (1980-1995)