Inflation Targeting and Nonlinear Policy Rules: The Case of Asymmetric Preferences (new title: The Fed's monetary policy rule and U.S. inflation: The case of asymmetric preferences)



Table 4: Structural Estimates

- baseline normalization of the orthogonality conditions -

1960:1 - 1979:2             1982:4 2003:2

c1

0.96**                         1.35**

(0.03)                            (0.04)

c2

1.15**                         0.34**

(0.16)                            (0.08)

c3

0.03                             0.13

(0.02)                            (0.11)

c4

-0.17**                          -0.01

(0.03)                            (0.01)

ρ

0.70**                         0.73**

(0.04)                            (0.02)

i*

5.4                               6.0

π*

4.2                               2.5

α

0.05                            0.20

(0.04)                            (0.18)

γ

-0.29**                          -0.06

(0.02)                            (0.10)

t-type statistics
p-value

W(2) p-value

J(19) p-value

.000                            .000

.000                             .530

___________.950______________________________.895_______________

Specification:

Et-1I - μ(it - i*)+(1 - ρ)f(π, - π)+ λyt + α(πt - π)2 + γλУ2 '' + ρi-1 - i*) zt-11 = 0
L κφ               V           κ 2            2κ J            J

Notes: This table reports the nonlinear GMM estimates of the structural parameters α and
γ. The estimates of the reduced-form coefficients are recovered from the estimates of the
structural parameters while the standard errors are computed using the delta method.
Inflation, output gap and the instrument set z
t-1 correspond to the baseline measures
described in the notes to Table 1. The t-type test refers to the null hypothesis (
μZκφ) =0.
W(n) refers to the Wald statistics of the test for n parameter restrictions, which is
distributed as a
χ2(n) under the joint null hypothesis α=γ=0. J(m) refers to the statistics of
Hansen’s test for
m overidentifying restrictions which is distributed as a χ2(m) under the
null hypothesis of valid overidentifying restrictions. The superscript ** and * denote the
rejection of the null hypothesis that the true coefficient is zero at the 1 percent and 5
percent significance levels, respectively.

25



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The Veblen-Gerschenkron Effect of FDI in Mezzogiorno and East Germany
3. Population ageing, taxation, pensions and health costs, CHERE Working Paper 2007/10
4. The name is absent
5. Non-causality in Bivariate Binary Panel Data
6. A Study of Adult 'Non-Singers' In Newfoundland
7. Existentialism: a Philosophy of Hope or Despair?
8. Nurses' retention and hospital characteristics in New South Wales, CHERE Discussion Paper No 52
9. Second Order Filter Distribution Approximations for Financial Time Series with Extreme Outlier
10. AN IMPROVED 2D OPTICAL FLOW SENSOR FOR MOTION SEGMENTATION
11. Naïve Bayes vs. Decision Trees vs. Neural Networks in the Classification of Training Web Pages
12. Reconsidering the value of pupil attitudes to studying post-16: a caution for Paul Croll
13. GROWTH, UNEMPLOYMENT AND THE WAGE SETTING PROCESS.
14. THE RISE OF RURAL-TO-RURAL LABOR MARKETS IN CHINA
15. Deprivation Analysis in Declining Inner City Residential Areas: A Case Study From Izmir, Turkey.
16. TOWARDS THE ZERO ACCIDENT GOAL: ASSISTING THE FIRST OFFICER MONITOR AND CHALLENGE CAPTAIN ERRORS
17. Passing the burden: corporate tax incidence in open economies
18. A Pure Test for the Elasticity of Yield Spreads
19. The name is absent
20. The name is absent