The name is absent

Even though all tests are in the fields ‘Mathematics’ and ‘Science’, they do not necessarily
test the same cognitive skill: The IEA tests are related to common elements of school
curricula across countries while IAEP is geared towards the curriculum in USA building on
the national testing procedures developed by the National Assessment of Education Progress
NAEP. The OECD PISA test has a more real-world approach and claims to assess the skills
that are considered to be essential for full participation in the society. These differences do
not, however, seem to be very important with respect to measured student performance. For
example, the correlation coefficient between the test results for the 18 countries participating
both in TIMSS 2003 and PISA 2003 is 0.94.⁶

Table 1. Data sources description

Year	Test organization	Acronym	Test subjects	Test age or grade	Countries	Data source
1980-81	IEA	SIMS	Mathematics	13 years	3 in 1980 14 in 1981	Lee and Barro (1997) Travers and Westbury (1989)
					11 in 1983
1983-85	IEA	SISS	Science	14 years	11 in 1984 1 in 1985	Postlethwaite and Wiley (1992)
1990-91	IAEP	IAEP	Mathematics and Science	13 years	2 in 1990 17 in 1991	Lee and Barro (1997)
1994-95	IEA	TIMSS	Mathematics and Science	Grade 8	4 in 1994 36 in 1995	timss.bc.edu/
1998-99	IEA	TIMSS-repeat	Mathematics and Science	Grade 8	6 in 1998 31 in 1999	timss.bc.edu/
2000-02	OECD	PISA 2000	Mathematics and Science	15 years	32 in 2000 9 in 2002	www.pisa.oecd.org
2002-03	IEA	TIMSS 2003	Mathematics and Science	Grade 8	7 in 2002 38 in 2003	timss.bc.edu/
2003	OECD	PISA 2003	Mathematics and Science	15 years	40 in 2003	www.pisa.oecd.org

Note. For some countries separate scores are reported for different parts of the country. We have calculated mean
country averages by using population as weight. IEA (except the 1983/84 test) and IAEP tests are conducted in
the fall in the southern hemisphere and in the spring in the northern hemisphere. PISA 2000 originally only
included five non-OECD countries, but nine additionally non-OECD countries conducted the same test in 2002.

Recently, it has become common to report national averages based on Items Response Theory
which weights the different questions by their difficulty (“Warm estimates”, Warm, 1989),
and standardizes the scores such that the average across all students across countries
participating is 500 with standard deviation of 100. Particularly the PISA studies employ this

⁶ The correlation coefficient between the average Science and Mathematics score in TIMSS-repeat 1999 and
PISA 2000 is 0.87 and for IAEP 1991 and TIMSS 1995 the correlation coefficient is 0.80. The correlation
coefficients are calculated using the adjusted test score described below. Interestingly, as can be seen from
Figure 2 below, USA has its poorest performance in the IAEP test that was based on the US curriculum.

More intriguing information

1. Stable Distributions
2. The Provisions on Geographical Indications in the TRIPS Agreement
3. Fortschritte bei der Exportorientierung von Dienstleistungsunternehmen
4. Investment in Next Generation Networks and the Role of Regulation: A Real Option Approach
5. Literary criticism as such can perhaps be called the art of rereading.
6. Cardiac Arrhythmia and Geomagnetic Activity
7. A Note on Productivity Change in European Co-operative Banks: The Luenberger Indicator Approach
8. On the estimation of hospital cost: the approach
9. Monopolistic Pricing in the Banking Industry: a Dynamic Model
10. Running head: CHILDREN'S ATTRIBUTIONS OF BELIEFS