Concerns for Equity and the Optimal Co-Payments for Publicly Provided Health Care



Figure 1: Expected utility as a function of the size of the co-paymant

As p increases beyond p0, more and more persons choose not to be
treated. The person illustrated by Figure 1 chooses treatment provided the
co-payment does not exceed p
1. For p > p1 expected utility is increasing in
p, cf. (7). In Figure 1,
v is strictly concave for p (p0,p1). Generally, this
need not be the case. And even if
V is strictly concave for p (p0,p1) with
a local maximum at
p*, it is not obvious which of the three values V (y,£, 0),
V (y,£,p*) and V (y,£,c) is highest.

3 Co-payment and social welfare

The objective of the government is to maximize the sum of welfare for all
persons. However, for a government concerned about equity it is not reason-
able to assume that this sum is unweighted. If the government cares about
equity, it is reasonable to assume that persons with low expected utility have
a higher weight in the sum of welfare than persons with high expected util-



More intriguing information

1. TOWARD CULTURAL ONCOLOGY: THE EVOLUTIONARY INFORMATION DYNAMICS OF CANCER
2. The name is absent
3. THE MEXICAN HOG INDUSTRY: MOVING BEYOND 2003
4. NATIONAL PERSPECTIVE
5. The Impact of Financial Openness on Economic Integration: Evidence from the Europe and the Cis
6. The name is absent
7. El Mercosur y la integración económica global
8. An Economic Analysis of Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Consumption: Implications for Overweight and Obesity among Higher- and Lower-Income Consumers
9. MULTIMODAL SEMIOTICS OF SPIRITUAL EXPERIENCES: REPRESENTING BELIEFS, METAPHORS, AND ACTIONS
10. DEVELOPING COLLABORATION IN RURAL POLICY: LESSONS FROM A STATE RURAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL