Concerns for Equity and the Optimal Co-Payments for Publicly Provided Health Care



Figure 1: Expected utility as a function of the size of the co-paymant

As p increases beyond p0, more and more persons choose not to be
treated. The person illustrated by Figure 1 chooses treatment provided the
co-payment does not exceed p
1. For p > p1 expected utility is increasing in
p, cf. (7). In Figure 1,
v is strictly concave for p (p0,p1). Generally, this
need not be the case. And even if
V is strictly concave for p (p0,p1) with
a local maximum at
p*, it is not obvious which of the three values V (y,£, 0),
V (y,£,p*) and V (y,£,c) is highest.

3 Co-payment and social welfare

The objective of the government is to maximize the sum of welfare for all
persons. However, for a government concerned about equity it is not reason-
able to assume that this sum is unweighted. If the government cares about
equity, it is reasonable to assume that persons with low expected utility have
a higher weight in the sum of welfare than persons with high expected util-



More intriguing information

1. From Communication to Presence: Cognition, Emotions and Culture towards the Ultimate Communicative Experience. Festschrift in honor of Luigi Anolli
2. AJAE Appendix: Willingness to Pay Versus Expected Consumption Value in Vickrey Auctions for New Experience Goods
3. The Employment Impact of Differences in Dmand and Production
4. The name is absent
5. Monopolistic Pricing in the Banking Industry: a Dynamic Model
6. Consumer Networks and Firm Reputation: A First Experimental Investigation
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Cultural Diversity and Human Rights: a propos of a minority educational reform
10. The name is absent