Unemployment in an Interdependent World



that across every market where the firm is active, it will equalize marginal revenues, i.e.,
∂Rij [и] /∂Lij [и] = ∂Ri [и] /∂Li [и] for all j, where Li [и] is firm φ,s total employment.
This rule determines the distribution of sales across markets given the total output of the
firm (which is, in turn, determined through the choice of
νi).

Vacancy posting. The optimal value of an intermediate input producer is given by:

Ji И


1

max---

Vi[φ] 1 + Г


RRi И


- Wi [и] Li[φ]


- PiVi [и] Ci


N

-Pi     Iij [^]fij + (1 - δ)Jii [и] ) ,

(5)


j=1

s.t. (i) Ri [и]   given in equation (4),

(ii) Li M = (1 - X)Li M + mi[θi]vi φl,

where r denotes the interest rate, wi [и] is the wage rate in country i paid by firm φ, J'i [и]
is the value of an intermediate input producer next period, and Li is firm φ's employment
in the next period. Constraint (i) is the revenue function and constraint (ii) gives the law
of motion of employment at the firm level. The first order condition for vacancy posting
can be stated as follows:

ciPi            dJ'i И                                tr

= (1 - δ) LT'                                  (6)

mi[θi]             ∂Li [и]

It shows that the firm equalizes marginal recruitment costs (given on the left hand side)
and the shadow value of labor (given on the right hand side). Note that firms with
different
φ face identical expected recruitment costs; hence, the shadow value of labor is
the same across firms, too.

From the equalization of marginal revenues across markets, it follows that the shadow
value of labor does not depend on the market where the additional output is actually
sold. Hence,
∂Ji [и] /∂Li [и] = ∂Ji [и] /∂Lij [и]Differentiating the objective function of
the firm (5) with respect to
Lij yields:

dJi [и] _ 1 d dRi[φ r 1 dwi [и]                            dJi [и]

SLj[^i = 1+r (ад - wi И - ∂L~W]Lij M + (1 - δ)(1 - χ) ∂LζM )   (7)

Employing the steady-state condition ∂Ji [и] /∂Lij [^] = ∂Ji' [^] /∂L'ij [^] we obtain:

dJi M _   1   dRi[φ] -   [ ] _ dwi [^] L [ A                (8)

∂Lij M   r + η∂Lij [φ] wi M ∂Lij ИLijmJ ■            (8)

Using (6) and ∂Ji [и] /∂Li [и] = ∂Ji [и] /∂Lij [и] , we can solve for ∂Ri∕∂Lij [^] and
obtain an expression that implicitly determines the optimal pricing behavior of the inter-
mediate input producer:

dRi [И]       r 1 l dwi [И]           ciPi Λ + η

= wi [И]+        Lij [И]+                 ■               (9)

∂Lij [и]              ∂Lij [и]           mi [θi]   1 - δ



More intriguing information

1. SOCIOECONOMIC TRENDS CHANGING RURAL AMERICA
2. The name is absent
3. Analyse des verbraucherorientierten Qualitätsurteils mittels assoziativer Verfahren am Beispiel von Schweinefleisch und Kartoffeln
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. The Nobel Memorial Prize for Robert F. Engle
7. The name is absent
8. Emissions Trading, Electricity Industry Restructuring and Investment in Pollution Abatement
9. Flatliners: Ideology and Rational Learning in the Diffusion of the Flat Tax
10. Nach der Einführung von Arbeitslosengeld II: deutlich mehr Verlierer als Gewinner unter den Hilfeempfängern
11. Dementia Care Mapping and Patient-Centred Care in Australian residential homes: An economic evaluation of the CARE Study, CHERE Working Paper 2008/4
12. Workforce or Workfare?
13. The magnitude and Cyclical Behavior of Financial Market Frictions
14. Distribution of aggregate income in Portugal from 1995 to 2000 within a SAM (Social Accounting Matrix) framework. Modeling the household sector
15. The name is absent
16. TOWARD CULTURAL ONCOLOGY: THE EVOLUTIONARY INFORMATION DYNAMICS OF CANCER
17. The Modified- Classroom ObservationScheduletoMeasureIntenticnaCommunication( M-COSMIC): EvaluationofReliabilityandValidity
18. The name is absent
19. Research Design, as Independent of Methods
20. Population ageing, taxation, pensions and health costs, CHERE Working Paper 2007/10