Unemployment in an Interdependent World



Labor market equilibrium. We can use the shadow value of labor as given in equation
(8) and the expression for the advantage of holding a job over searching as given in
equation (11) in the bargaining solution (12) to obtain:

r 1 _ d dRi[M]    d ∂wi[φ]

wi[M] = β i ∂Lij M   β i ∂Lij M Lij [м] + (1 β i)rUi'                (13)

Using qij [m] = MLij [m] in equation (4) and differentiating with respect to labor input
L
ij [M] (assuming that Iij [M] > 0), leads to

∂R⅛]
dLij [M]


σ - 1 r 1 1 r pʌ- τij Yj

(14)


σ qij [m] σ m (Pj ) σ     mm1-ν J ,

which allows to solve the wage differential equation (13):11

wi[M] = βi( σ Λ dRi m + (1 - βi)rUi-                   (15)

σ - βi ∂Lij[M]

Using equation (3) inequation (14) and noting that dRiij ] = ( σσ1 ) φτ ij1pij = ( σσ1 ) MPii,
where the last equality follows from equalization of marginal costs between markets, leads
to the job creation curve

Wi = σ - 1 φ -  Ci  r + η

(16)


Pi    σ - βi i   mii] 1 - δ'

The job creation curve slopes downward in θ since a higher degree of labor market tightness
makes it more costly to fill vacancies so that a smaller share of the surplus Φ can accrue
to the worker. Hence, the real wage falls in
θ. Importantly, the wage rate depends only
on aggregate variables such as
Pi , Φi or θ and does, therefore, not vary across firms. The
intuition is that firms with high productivity are larger and move their marginal revenue
functions further down by exactly the amount that equalizes the value of a filled vacancy.

Combining equations (3), (9), and (15) shows that the wage rate is given by the sum
of the value of non-employment (
rUi) and the rent that the worker can extract from the

firm:


wi [M] = rUi +


βi r + η CiPi

1 β i 1 δ mi [θ]


(17)


Using the expression for Ui, we can write rUi = biΦi + θim[θi] (jEi Ui). Using equation
(11) and noting that w
i [M] - rUi is equal for all firms (see equation (17)), one can derive
the following wage curve:

Wi:


— = bi Φi +
P
i     i i


β i     ci

1 - βi 1 - δ


R∏+4

mi i]


(18)


∂wi

∂Lij

into equation (13).


∂     ∂ ∂ ∂RiM

β f σ ʌ d у dLij >
βi σ - βi)   ∂Lij


11The solution can be checked by reinserting
= β f
σ λ ∕∂Ri[^] /-1 1 '

βi V - βi     ∂Li1     σ    Li3)

10



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Dendritic Inhibition Enhances Neural Coding Properties
3. Pupils’ attitudes towards art teaching in primary school: an evaluation tool
4. Handling the measurement error problem by means of panel data: Moment methods applied on firm data
5. Integrating the Structural Auction Approach and Traditional Measures of Market Power
6. BEN CHOI & YANBING CHEN
7. The name is absent
8. Yield curve analysis
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent