Currently, Hulaliu and Seri perceive the highest level of family well-being (resp. 7.43 and
7.59) while Hutumuri and Haruku score significantly lower (score 6.20; p=<0.002). Generally,
well-being is expected to increase (in Haruku) or remain stable, but Hutumuri fishers are
most pessimistic.
Table 16.22. Factors correlated with social sustainability indicators. Significant correlations indicated
with asterisks.
Social sustainability |
Villagers |
Villagers |
Villagers |
Years |
High job |
Acceptable |
Elitist |
Tradition of collective |
-.011 |
.+029 |
-.008 |
+062 |
+.230** |
+.082 |
.002 |
Family well-being |
-.183* |
+.163* |
-.039 |
-.067 |
+.183* |
+.288** |
-.103 |
Income |
-.111 |
+.043 |
-.177* |
-.143 |
+.180* |
+.162* |
-.184* |
Community harmony |
-.038 |
-.041 |
+.026 |
-.053 |
-.063 |
-.037 |
.106 |
Discussion of village |
-.034 |
+.168* |
+.029 |
+.184* |
+.090 |
+.095 |
-.094 |
Table 16.22. continued
Social sustainability |
Community |
Positive |
Village |
Villagers |
Member of |
Age |
Education |
Tradition of collective |
-.032 |
+.155* |
+.049 |
-.177* |
-.047 |
.072 |
-.075 |
Family well-being |
-.081 |
+.039 |
+.252** |
-.082 |
+.219** |
.018 |
-.018 |
Income |
.206** |
-.187* |
+.123 |
-.059 |
+.175* |
-.116 |
.108 |
Comm’ty harmony |
-.137 |
+.157* |
-.058 |
+.060 |
-.078 |
-.117 |
.173* |
Discussion of village |
-.008 |
+.163* |
+.085 |
-.198** |
+.061 |
.164* |
-.112 |
Income
The changes in income over time are all significant (Table 16.23). Perception on change in income
was positively related to job satisfaction and membership in organizations (Table 16.22). Fishers
happy in their job and belonging to groups had a more positive perception. Where change in
income was more negative, fishers were more likely to be receiving external income, believed
strongly in the importance of sasi, and were less willing to bend rules. Fishers who were positive
about change in income perceived decision-making in their village to be by consensus or by
majority. They were also most likely to consider villagers as having the key responsibility in
fisheries management. This last correlation helps to explain why Seri fishers have such a positive
perception of income. Seri was the only village where more than half the fishers held this opinion,
while in Haruku, no fishers shared this view. Nolloth was one of the three villages where fishers
believed that the government held most or all management responsibility. It is difficult to imagine
why these attitudes are related to perceived income.
Seri and Hutumuri fishers were least likely to receive external income. However, In terms of the amount
of external income received per year, the two villages were on an average higher. Hutumuri fishers, as
we know, are the least willing to bend the rules, but again, the relationship to income is obscure.
Comparative Analysis of Case Study Villages 231
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Quality Enhancement for E-Learning Courses: The Role of Student Feedback
3. Imitation in location choice
4. The name is absent
5. The Modified- Classroom ObservationScheduletoMeasureIntenticnaCommunication( M-COSMIC): EvaluationofReliabilityandValidity
6. Conflict and Uncertainty: A Dynamic Approach
7. The name is absent
8. IMPACTS OF EPA DAIRY WASTE REGULATIONS ON FARM PROFITABILITY
9. A Critical Examination of the Beliefs about Learning a Foreign Language at Primary School
10. The migration of unskilled youth: Is there any wage gain?