Currently, Hulaliu and Seri perceive the highest level of family well-being (resp. 7.43 and
7.59) while Hutumuri and Haruku score significantly lower (score 6.20; p=<0.002). Generally,
well-being is expected to increase (in Haruku) or remain stable, but Hutumuri fishers are
most pessimistic.
Table 16.22. Factors correlated with social sustainability indicators. Significant correlations indicated
with asterisks.
Social sustainability |
Villagers |
Villagers |
Villagers |
Years |
High job |
Acceptable |
Elitist |
Tradition of collective |
-.011 |
.+029 |
-.008 |
+062 |
+.230** |
+.082 |
.002 |
Family well-being |
-.183* |
+.163* |
-.039 |
-.067 |
+.183* |
+.288** |
-.103 |
Income |
-.111 |
+.043 |
-.177* |
-.143 |
+.180* |
+.162* |
-.184* |
Community harmony |
-.038 |
-.041 |
+.026 |
-.053 |
-.063 |
-.037 |
.106 |
Discussion of village |
-.034 |
+.168* |
+.029 |
+.184* |
+.090 |
+.095 |
-.094 |
Table 16.22. continued
Social sustainability |
Community |
Positive |
Village |
Villagers |
Member of |
Age |
Education |
Tradition of collective |
-.032 |
+.155* |
+.049 |
-.177* |
-.047 |
.072 |
-.075 |
Family well-being |
-.081 |
+.039 |
+.252** |
-.082 |
+.219** |
.018 |
-.018 |
Income |
.206** |
-.187* |
+.123 |
-.059 |
+.175* |
-.116 |
.108 |
Comm’ty harmony |
-.137 |
+.157* |
-.058 |
+.060 |
-.078 |
-.117 |
.173* |
Discussion of village |
-.008 |
+.163* |
+.085 |
-.198** |
+.061 |
.164* |
-.112 |
Income
The changes in income over time are all significant (Table 16.23). Perception on change in income
was positively related to job satisfaction and membership in organizations (Table 16.22). Fishers
happy in their job and belonging to groups had a more positive perception. Where change in
income was more negative, fishers were more likely to be receiving external income, believed
strongly in the importance of sasi, and were less willing to bend rules. Fishers who were positive
about change in income perceived decision-making in their village to be by consensus or by
majority. They were also most likely to consider villagers as having the key responsibility in
fisheries management. This last correlation helps to explain why Seri fishers have such a positive
perception of income. Seri was the only village where more than half the fishers held this opinion,
while in Haruku, no fishers shared this view. Nolloth was one of the three villages where fishers
believed that the government held most or all management responsibility. It is difficult to imagine
why these attitudes are related to perceived income.
Seri and Hutumuri fishers were least likely to receive external income. However, In terms of the amount
of external income received per year, the two villages were on an average higher. Hutumuri fishers, as
we know, are the least willing to bend the rules, but again, the relationship to income is obscure.
Comparative Analysis of Case Study Villages 231
More intriguing information
1. The Impact of Optimal Tariffs and Taxes on Agglomeration2. Segmentación en la era de la globalización: ¿Cómo encontrar un segmento nuevo de mercado?
3. Expectation Formation and Endogenous Fluctuations in Aggregate Demand
4. Spousal Labor Market Effects from Government Health Insurance: Evidence from a Veterans Affairs Expansion
5. The name is absent
6. THE EFFECT OF MARKETING COOPERATIVES ON COST-REDUCING PROCESS INNOVATION ACTIVITY
7. The name is absent
8. Regional dynamics in mountain areas and the need for integrated policies
9. Benefits of travel time savings for freight transportation : beyond the costs
10. Cross border cooperation –promoter of tourism development