Migrating Football Players, Transfer Fees and Migration Controls



small league. As a result, for α= 0.1 the small league will not find it advantageous to
train talents, while the big league still invests in training talents.

Table 3. Investment in players in a closed league*)

α

= 0.1

α

= 0.3

α = 0.

5

α = 0.

7

α = 0.

9

N = 100

e

"T^

W

e

T

W

e

T

W

e

T

W

e

T

-W

σ=7

1.42

0.10

460.7

4.03

0.42

465.9

5.52

0.51

473.1

5.39

0.51

478.6

4.53

0.45

481.9

σ=11

2.13

0.23

461.4

6.70

0.57

473.2

9.83

0.69

488.2

9.11

0.66

498.9

6.91

0.58

504.5

σ=15

2.64

0.29

462.3

9.01

0.66

479.6

13.95 0.79

501.4

12.30 0.75

516.2

8.63

0.65

523.0

N = 50

e

T

W

e

T

W

e

T

W

e

T

W

e

^T^

^^W

σ=7

1.00

0.00

195.6

2.09

0.22

196.5

3.19

0.35

199.0

3.69

0.39

201.7

3.60

0.38

203.8

σ=11

1.05

0.01

195.6

3.32

0.36

198.7

5.44

0.51

204.5

6.27

0.55

210.2

5.68

0.52

214.1

σ=15

1.29

0.08

195.7

4.35

0.44

200.7

7.56

0.61

209.6

8.63

0.65

217.8

7.32

0.60

223.0

*)The value of the parameters used for this calculation are: T = 0, δ = 0.3. W stands for Ni 0g i.

Increasing capabilities of players gives leagues more incentives to train talented players.
Welfare in the leagues, measured by
Ni log(Πi), increases with players’ capability if
investment in talents (
e>1) takes place. Moreover, raising talents (e>1) always increase
the welfare above the level when only mediocre players are employed (
e=1). In the latter
case, welfare would equal 460.5 and 195.6 for the big league and the small league,
respectively. For all cases considered, however, the number of talented players turns out
to be lower than the maximal number.

4.1.1 The optimum in open leagues

Table 4 shows for parameter values that we used before how many talents should be

**

trained (indicated by T1 + T2 in the table) and how the talents should be allocated across

*

the leagues (indicated by Ti in the table), according to first-order conditions (9)-(11).

Just as when talents are exogenously given, talents should play only in the big league
when
α is small. The talents should be raised in both leagues, however, in this case. A
transfer from the big league to the small league is enacted, that is very small in absolute
terms, but as a percentage of the wage sum it is large: 86 percent of the wage sum of the
emigrated players is transferred to the small league, if
α= 0.1and ο= 7. Nevertheless,
total welfare for the small league is only marginally above the welfare the league would
receive if it only employed mediocre talents. When for
α= 0.1 capability increases the

16



More intriguing information

1. The voluntary welfare associations in Germany: An overview
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Ahorro y crecimiento: alguna evidencia para la economía argentina, 1970-2004
6. The resources and strategies that 10-11 year old boys use to construct masculinities in the school setting
7. Economic Evaluation of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), CHERE Working Paper 2007/6
8. Estimating the Technology of Cognitive and Noncognitive Skill Formation
9. Monopolistic Pricing in the Banking Industry: a Dynamic Model
10. Multiple Arrhythmogenic Substrate for Tachycardia in a
11. AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF COTTON AND PEANUT RESEARCH IN SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
12. Review of “The Hesitant Hand: Taming Self-Interest in the History of Economic Ideas”
13. Informal Labour and Credit Markets: A Survey.
14. Distortions in a multi-level co-financing system: the case of the agri-environmental programme of Saxony-Anhalt
15. Convergence in TFP among Italian Regions - Panel Unit Roots with Heterogeneity and Cross Sectional Dependence
16. The name is absent
17. Qualification-Mismatch and Long-Term Unemployment in a Growth-Matching Model
18. The Distribution of Income of Self-employed, Entrepreneurs and Professions as Revealed from Micro Income Tax Statistics in Germany
19. A Multimodal Framework for Computer Mediated Learning: The Reshaping of Curriculum Knowledge and Learning
20. Macro-regional evaluation of the Structural Funds using the HERMIN modelling framework