where by tr {■} we denote the trace of a 2 × 2-matrix and by (∙, ■) the inner
product of the Euclidean space R2. Hence, we have for 0 ≤ t ≤ T
0 = ut(t,x) — ʌɑ(t, x) xtx2ux 1(t, x) — λ^2(t, x) σv(t,x) ux2(t,x')
+ j (-H-'d "ʃ xι(t,x) + (σv(t,x))2 ux2x2(t,x^ + b(t,x) ux(tt,x)
u(T,x) = xt.
We jump directly to Step ⅛, omitting Step 3: We define Yt = u(t,Xt) and
Zt = στ (t, Xt,u(t, Xt)) у u(t,Xt), then (X,Y, Z) is an adapted solution of
(11) and (12). ■
Theorem 1 shows the close relationship between the asset price process
and the information process. Given the information process and the pricing
kernel Theorem 1 establishes a characterization of the asset price process
as a function of the information process and the pricing kernel. The drift
of the asset price process is governed by the market price of risk λt and
the diffusion of the asset price process Zt. The diffusion Zt depends on the
information process It itself, on the volatility process of It, i.e. σ1t, and on
the first derivatives w.r.t. xt and X2 of the function characterizing the asset
price: ⅛ & i, σ1t ), (t, It, σ1t ). Thus, with Theorem 1 we have an explicit
representation of the asset price process in terms of the information process
and the pricing kernel for a 2-dimensional market model. The application of
Theorem 1 to п-dimensional market models is straight forward.
It is obvious from Theorem 1 that the drift of the asset price process
depends on the volatility of the information process. Thus, empirical stud-
ies implicitly assuming non stochastic volatility of the information process
may find unexplainable variations in the drift. Further, neglecting stochastic
volatility of the information process leads to only one risk premium in the
asset price process, i.e. σY = 0 provides Zt2 = = 0.
To gain some better understanding of the implications of Theorem 1 in
the remainder of this section we discuss the case when all the coefficients are
only functions in t. Thus, with this assumption equation (10) simplifies to
0 = ut(t,x1,x2) — λ^1 ( (t) x1x2ux 1(t,x1,x2) (13)
— λ^( (t) σy(t) ux2(t,x1,x2)
+ 2 ^xlx2 uχtχt(t,x1,x2 ) + (σv (t))2
ua¾a¾ (t, xl, X-)^
+b(t) ux2(t,X1,X2) , 0 ≤ t ≤ T,
u(T, x) = x1
16
More intriguing information
1. Towards a Mirror System for the Development of Socially-Mediated Skills2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Keynesian Dynamics and the Wage-Price Spiral:Estimating a Baseline Disequilibrium Approach
5. Passing the burden: corporate tax incidence in open economies
6. Credit Market Competition and Capital Regulation
7. The Impact of Minimum Wages on Wage Inequality and Employment in the Formal and Informal Sector in Costa Rica
8. The Determinants of Individual Trade Policy Preferences: International Survey Evidence
9. What Contribution Can Residential Field Courses Make to the Education of 11-14 Year-olds?
10. The name is absent