Partner Selection Criteria in Strategic Alliances When to Ally with Weak Partners



in partner selection. Both Gulati (1995), Li & Rowley (2002) and Gulati & Gargiulo
(1999) focus on intra-industry alliances.2 However, entry alliances in emerging markets
often involve firms from different industries, which, because of industrial separated pasts,
may not have any previous direct ties and merely insignificant indirect ties.

2.2 Insufficiency of Current Theories

Resource-based theory aims to address which assets should be brought together, whereas
transaction cost theory informs about
how these assets should be brought together. For
this reason, transaction cost economics does not inform the specifics around selection cri-
teria. The resource-based explanation offers some managerial guidance, but the proposed
prescriptions are problematic for several reasons.
First, the general argument that strong
resources in the relevant market equals and attractive partner is too simplistic. A growing
literature developed by Joseph Schumpeter (1934) and pioneered by Clayton Christensen
(1997) documents the failure of leading firms, signaling that allying with the strongest
firm may not always be the best strategy.
Second, the resource-based view is not very
context-sensitive (notable exceptions are Miller & Shamsie (1996) and Brush & Artz
(1999)), yet, context is very important for partner selection (Geringer, 1991; Mahnke,
2001).
Third, it views the possession of critical resources as a primary reason (Hitt et al.,
2000) and even
prerequisite for alliance formation (Das et al., 2000) and consequently
pays less attention to alternative parameters. In sum, the resource-based contribution to
the alliance literature has focused on the static properties of firm’s existing resource en-
dowments and hence implicitly adopted simplifying assumptions of constant or neutral
levels of alternative explanatory variables.

3. ASPIRATION LEVELS AND THE SHADOW OF THE FUTURE

Current research addresses partner selection, because it affects the mix of resources and
capabilities available to the alliance. Yet, it is not necessarily the critically of resources
(Barney, 1991) that determines the attractiveness of a partner. Spekman (1988) claims

2 Gulati notes that “A useful extension of this research would examine both cross-industry and intraindustry
alliances within a single unifying framework” (1995: 646).



More intriguing information

1. O funcionalismo de Sellars: uma pesquisa histδrica
2. Reversal of Fortune: Macroeconomic Policy, International Finance, and Banking in Japan
3. On s-additive robust representation of convex risk measures for unbounded financial positions in the presence of uncertainty about the market model
4. Protocol for Past BP: a randomised controlled trial of different blood pressure targets for people with a history of stroke of transient ischaemic attack (TIA) in primary care
5. Does Market Concentration Promote or Reduce New Product Introductions? Evidence from US Food Industry
6. Regional Intergration and Migration: An Economic Geography Model with Hetergenous Labour Force
7. Evolutionary Clustering in Indonesian Ethnic Textile Motifs
8. Foreign Direct Investment and Unequal Regional Economic Growth in China
9. The Triangular Relationship between the Commission, NRAs and National Courts Revisited
10. The name is absent
11. THE EFFECT OF MARKETING COOPERATIVES ON COST-REDUCING PROCESS INNOVATION ACTIVITY
12. Contribution of Economics to Design of Sustainable Cattle Breeding Programs in Eastern Africa: A Choice Experiment Approach
13. The name is absent
14. The name is absent
15. Wirtschaftslage und Reformprozesse in Estland, Lettland, und Litauen: Bericht 2001
16. Placenta ingestion by rats enhances y- and n-opioid antinociception, but suppresses A-opioid antinociception
17. Forecasting Financial Crises and Contagion in Asia using Dynamic Factor Analysis
18. National urban policy responses in the European Union: Towards a European urban policy?
19. The name is absent
20. The name is absent