The name is absent



energy sector in transforming energy3, while wit captures the final energy
consumption per GDP unit (final energy intensity index)
.

Secondly, to clarify the role of both factors in explaining energy intensity
inequalities across countries, we define two hypothetical vectors of primary
energy consumption per GDP unit and we let just one of the values of the
factors included in (2) diverge from the mean. Accordingly, we obtain the
following fictitious factors
4:

eitf = fit * wt                        (3)

eiwt = ft*wit                      (4)

where ft y wt are world averages of the factor being considered.

Resorting to Duro’s (2003) methodology and Duro and Padilla (2006), using the
Theil index (Theil, 1967)
5 as the benchmark inequality index allows a synthetic
decomposition of global energy intensity inequalities into three factors:

T (e, p) = T (ef, p) + T (ew, p) + log 11 + σ             (5)

ч     et J

T(e,p) = Tf + Tw + interf,w                         (6)

where σ is the covariance (weighted) between the two factors and etf is the
world average of the first fictitious factor;
e is the energy intensity and p the
weight in global GDP.

3 Nevertheless, the index will not only depend on how efficient countries are in the conversion of
one or other type of energy but also on their different energy mix. For instance, according to the
International Energy Agency, the heat generated by nuclear power plants is considered primary
energy while for hydro-electric stations, wind or photovoltaic solar power system, only the
energy value of the electricity generated is taken into account. Consequently, the efficiency in
transforming nuclear energy is less than in the case of fossil fuels, while it is always greater for
renewable energy.

4 This methodology as developed by Duro (2003) to analyze spatial income inequality.

5 The Theil index has been used in different works on environmental distribution (Alcantara and
Duro, 2004; Duro and Padilla, 2006; Padilla and Serrano, 2006; Padilla and Duro, 2009;
Cantore and Padilla, 2010a; Duro
et al., 2010). Cowell (1995) highlights its analytical
advantages, which include its ability to decompose additively a series of multiplicative factors.
This is due to the fact that it is a logarithmic function.



More intriguing information

1. Fiscal Sustainability Across Government Tiers
2. Impact of Ethanol Production on U.S. and Regional Gasoline Prices and On the Profitability of U.S. Oil Refinery Industry
3. Stable Distributions
4. A Rare Presentation of Crohn's Disease
5. Performance - Complexity Comparison of Receivers for a LTE MIMO–OFDM System
6. EMU's Decentralized System of Fiscal Policy
7. The Impact of EU Accession in Romania: An Analysis of Regional Development Policy Effects by a Multiregional I-O Model
8. THE ECONOMICS OF COMPETITION IN HEALTH INSURANCE- THE IRISH CASE STUDY.
9. Population ageing, taxation, pensions and health costs, CHERE Working Paper 2007/10
10. Revisiting The Bell Curve Debate Regarding the Effects of Cognitive Ability on Wages
11. Gianluigi Zenti, President, Academia Barilla SpA - The Changing Consumer: Demanding but Predictable
12. Globalization and the benefits of trade
13. The name is absent
14. The name is absent
15. Innovation in commercialization of pelagic fish: the example of "Srdela Snack" Franchise
16. The name is absent
17. The name is absent
18. Forecasting Financial Crises and Contagion in Asia using Dynamic Factor Analysis
19. The Impact of Optimal Tariffs and Taxes on Agglomeration
20. Großhandel: Steigende Umsätze und schwungvolle Investitionsdynamik