5. New Keynesian Framework
Phillips curve it is necessary to assure for price stickiness in addition to monopolistic competition. This
shall be done by introducing Calvo (1983) contracts, which means that each producer is only allowed
to reset her price with probability 1 - δ in any given period, independent of the time since the last
adjustment. Therefore, a measure of 1 - δ of firms reset theirs prices each period, while a measure of δ
of firms keep their prices constant and simply adjust their individual output in order to meet demand.
1 /(1 — δ) then captures the average duration of a price (see Gall 2008, p. 43):
∏tH β βEt [ ∏t+1 ,h ] + (1 δ )(δ1 δβ ) ^ t, (42)
* - МЧ * 1 . (1 — δ*)(1 — δ*β) ʌ*
πt,F = βEt[πt+1 ,F]+ δ* Kt . (43)
In equation (42) πt,H := pt,H — pt-1 ,h is defined as current domestic PPI inflation, which typically
differs from domestic CPI inflation. The NKPC (42) states that current domestic PPI inflation πt,H is
an increasing function of both expected domestic PPI inflation Et [πt+1,H] and the deviation of current
domestic real marginal production cost from its zero-inflation steady-state value ^t := κt — κflex.
Note that an analogous interpretation for (43) also holds abroad. However, δ* is assumed to differ from
δ and κ* also from κ, although κflex = (κ*)flex = (θ — 1)/θ. Furthermore, let us assume that ’’setting a
new price at home” and ”setting a new price abroad” are stochastically independent events. As domestic
and foreign firms both set theirs prices in the currency of the countries where they are located, the
present model features producer-currency pricing, which is one of the possible occurrences of pricing to
market.20
Nonetheless, it would be desirable to express equations (39), (40), (42), and (43) in terms of the output
gap, which shall be defined as the difference between the sticky-price and the flexible-price output devi-
ations: xt := yt — yflex and x* := y * — ( y * )flex. If we want to implement this we have to investigate the
ratio of the sticky-price real marginal production cost κt and its flexible-price counterpart κtf lex given by
(25):
where Ytf lex denotes the domestic flexible-price equilibrium output as given by equation (38). Log-
linearizing this expression around the zero-inflation steady-state yields:
κt
Wt
Pt,H At
flex
t
θ-1
θWtTt-n
(θ — 1)PtAt '
(44)
Combining equation (44) with the labor supply curve (20), the production function (21), and the condition
for domestic goods market clearing (34), we obtain:
κt = θγ ( At ´
κflex ( θ — 1)( Tt
ξ
Tt1-n
1Yt)-ρAt = θ
1 γAtξ-1Tt(n-1)(ρ-1)Ytρ-ξ =
Yt ρ-ξ
γflex
(45)
^ t = ( ρ — ξ )( y t — y fflex ) = ( ρ — ξ ) xt. (46)
Hence, by using (46) equations (39), (40), (42), and (43) rearrange to:
xt |
= Et [ xt+1] + P {Et [ ∏t+1] — |
it} — (1 — n)Et[δtt+1] + Et[yt+χ ] |
yf lιerx, |
(47) |
* |
= Et[ x*+1] + -{Et [ π*+1] — |
i*} + nEt [∆ tt+1] + Et [( y *+1) flex ] |
— ( y * ) flex, |
(48) |
πt,H |
= βEt [ ∏t+1 ,h ]+ μxt + ut, |
(49) | ||
* |
= βEt[ π*+1 ,f ] + μ*χ* + u* |
(50) |
20This specification has already been adopted in the theoretical literature (see, e.g., Clarida et al. 2002, p. 885) and can
also be justified by empirical evidence for most of the G7 countries (see Leith/Malley 2007, p. 420).
14