DESARROLLO Y SO
CIEDAD
SEGUNDO SEMESTRE DE 2006, PP. 245-260.
Table 3 presents summary statistics for the regression variables.
Using these three variables we estimate the impact of social proximity,
social integration and reciprocity on giving. As expected, there are
high correlations between variables (ρpi(f)pi(j) = 0.69, ρpi(f)fi = -0.34 &
ρfipi(j)= -0.32) which may indicate multicollinearity.
Table 3. Variables and Descriptives. | |||||
Mean |
Median |
Mode |
Max/Min |
n | |
pi(f ): Social Proximity |
0.49 |
0 |
0 |
1/0 |
53 |
fi: Degree-out |
2.79 |
3 |
4 |
7/0 |
53 |
pi( j): Reciprocity |
0.21 |
0 0 |
1/0 |
53 | |
Giving |
2.96 |
3 |
0/519 |
6/0 |
53 |
Table 4 presents the regression results. Columns 1 to 3 explore each
variable separately. The effect of degree-out on giving is marginal
and both social proximity and reciprocity are highly significant. Also
note that the latter has a coefficient which is twice as high as that of
the former.
To explore in depth the effects of reciprocity and social integration
we use pi( j), a variable which assigns value zero to those individuals
who knew they were never going to be matched to a friend and the
inverse of degree-out (1/fi) for subjects facing friends. Given the
multicollinearity problem we must study social proximity and reci-
procity separately. Column 4 jointly explores social proximity and
integration and column 5 uses social integration and reciprocity. The
results are clear: the model presented in column 5 is highly explanatory.
Furthermore, the model presented in column 6 (with high
multicollinearity) suggests that social proximity offers no additional
predictive power once social integration and reciprocity are included
in the regression. In sum, regressions 5 & 6 show that pi( j) has a
positive and significant coefficient but pi( f) has no effect when both fi
and pi( j) have been introduced. So there is no friendship effect on
giving once degree-out and reciprocity have been taken into account.
19 For subjects playing with strangers and friends respectively.
255
More intriguing information
1. Housing Market in Malaga: An Application of the Hedonic Methodology2. A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON UNDERINVESTMENT IN AGRICULTURAL R&D
3. The open method of co-ordination: Some remarks regarding old-age security within an enlarged European Union
4. THE UNCERTAIN FUTURE OF THE MEXICAN MARKET FOR U.S. COTTON: IMPACT OF THE ELIMINATION OF TEXTILE AND CLOTHING QUOTAS
5. Revisiting The Bell Curve Debate Regarding the Effects of Cognitive Ability on Wages
6. The geography of collaborative knowledge production: entropy techniques and results for the European Union
7. TINKERING WITH VALUATION ESTIMATES: IS THERE A FUTURE FOR WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT MEASURES?
8. Impacts of Tourism and Fiscal Expenditure on Remote Islands in Japan: A Panel Data Analysis
9. Keynesian Dynamics and the Wage-Price Spiral:Estimating a Baseline Disequilibrium Approach
10. Willingness-to-Pay for Energy Conservation and Free-Ridership on Subsidization – Evidence from Germany