Altruism with Social Roots: An Emerging Literature



Altruism with Social Roots: An Emerging Literature
Pablo Branas-Garza y Maria Paz Espinosa

MRQ- with the only difference that they do not know with whom;
dictators know only that they will play with a
friend in Fi (which im-
plies
pi(f) = 1 and 0 < pi(j) 1, see Table 2). Then they are informed
that they will play with any
randomly chosen close friend, that is any
element of
Fi. Observe that although pi(f) = 1 the probability of being
matched with a specific friend
j is less than 1, in particular pi(j) = 1/fi,
with
fi being the total number of friends11. In contrast, the baseline
treatment comprises dictators playing with strangers.

Note that pi(j) 1 implies on the one hand that reciprocity has less
importance since the dictator does not know exactly who the recipi-
ent is (and therefore obtaining ex-post benefits is made more diffi-
cult), and on the other hand it eliminates the effect that knowledge of
the recipient’s identity may have on the dictator. Interestingly, even
though direct reciprocity and knowledge of identity are removed, there
is still a friendship effect in BDE, in a similar direction to that re-
ported by MRQ:

R1’: In the absence of direct reciprocity, social proximity increases
giving.

Goeree, McConnell, Mitchell, Tromp and Yariv (2006) (GMMTY) con-
ducted a survey among 10-12 year old girls in Pasadena, eliciting
friendship relations among these fifth and sixth graders (see Table 1)
as well as a large number of personal attributes. An interesting feature
is that subjects play 10 different dictator game decisions with recipi-
ents at different social distances -from the dictators- although only
one of the decisions is implemented (randomly).

As in MRQ the matching mechanism explores different relations be-
tween players: friends, friends of friends and greater social distances.
This procedure allows proximity to be graduated more accurately and
enables the effect of spatial measures of intensity of relations on gen-
erosity to be analyzed. Their study of giving as a function of distance
between players yields a clear result: there are large and significant
effects of (social) distance on giving. They also control for the dicta-

11 p( j) = 1 only for those subjects with fi = 1.

252



More intriguing information

1. CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS
2. Strategic monetary policy in a monetary union with non-atomistic wage setters
3. INSTITUTIONS AND PRICE TRANSMISSION IN THE VIETNAMESE HOG MARKET
4. O funcionalismo de Sellars: uma pesquisa histδrica
5. The growing importance of risk in financial regulation
6. THE ECONOMICS OF COMPETITION IN HEALTH INSURANCE- THE IRISH CASE STUDY.
7. The name is absent
8. The Role of State Trading Enterprises and Their Impact on Agricultural Development and Economic Growth in Developing Countries
9. Expectation Formation and Endogenous Fluctuations in Aggregate Demand
10. Valuing Access to our Public Lands: A Unique Public Good Pricing Experiment
11. Review of “The Hesitant Hand: Taming Self-Interest in the History of Economic Ideas”
12. The name is absent
13. Sectoral specialisation in the EU a macroeconomic perspective
14. Testing Gribat´s Law Across Regions. Evidence from Spain.
15. Gender and headship in the twenty-first century
16. Ongoing Emergence: A Core Concept in Epigenetic Robotics
17. The Tangible Contribution of R&D Spending Foreign-Owned Plants to a Host Region: a Plant Level Study of the Irish Manufacturing Sector (1980-1996)
18. The name is absent
19. ADJUSTMENT TO GLOBALISATION: A STUDY OF THE FOOTWEAR INDUSTRY IN EUROPE
20. Neural Network Modelling of Constrained Spatial Interaction Flows