Table 2. Estimated Coefficients for the Four Different Models (Continued)._________________ | ||||||
Variable |
Units |
Model 1 |
Model 2 |
Model 3 |
Model 4 |
KASb |
lsb |
$/bale |
12.07 |
12.07 |
12.08 |
12.08 |
11.70 |
ssb |
$/bale |
0.532 |
0.533 |
0.533 |
0.533 |
0.535 |
cs |
$/ton |
3.07 |
3.07 |
3.07 |
3.07 |
3.09 |
rm |
$/acre |
7.83 |
7.84 |
7.83 |
7.84 |
7.90 |
fpm |
$/mile |
0.336 |
0.341 |
0.336 |
0.341 |
0.345 |
gsm |
$/mile |
1.79 |
1.84 |
1.80 |
1.84 |
2.07 |
fertilizer |
percent |
112.5 |
112.6 |
112.4 |
112.6 |
113.4 |
fcwf |
$/acre |
6.30 |
6.37 |
6.24 |
6.41 |
6.72 |
swf |
$/acre |
6.09 |
6.11 |
6.06 |
6.12 |
6.10 |
dntwf |
$/acre |
11.35 |
11.34 |
11.28 |
11.39 |
11.22 |
drtwf |
$/acre |
6.67 |
6.75 |
6.61 |
6.75 |
7.36 |
pntwf |
$/acre |
11.14 |
11.40 |
11.00 |
11.20 |
11.37 |
prtwf |
$/acre |
9.17 |
9.25 |
9.11 |
9.25 |
9.11 |
Scale Factors | ||||||
constant |
-- |
1.364 |
1.452 |
1.241 |
1.792 |
-- |
ha |
-- |
-6.2×10-5 |
-2.1×10-4 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
ha2 |
-- |
-- |
4.3×10-8 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
1/ha |
-- |
-- |
-- |
33.027 |
-- |
-- |
ln(ha) |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-0.076 |
-- |
In-sample Statistics | ||||||
CCc |
-- |
0.871 |
0.871 |
0.874 |
0.872 |
-- |
RMSEd |
-- |
27,648 |
27,688 |
27,598 |
27,607 |
-- |
a Functional form of the scale factor adjustment
b Average custom rate reported by Kansas Agricultural Statistics
c Correlation coefficient
d Root mean square error
Table 3. Out of Sample Model Statistics for the Four Different Models
Model 1 _______(Linear/ |
Model 2 |
Model 3 |
Model 4 | |
CCc |
0.864 |
0.858 |
0.869 |
0.865 |
RMSEd_____ |
________28,368 |
29,021 |
28,205 |
28,353 |
Functional form of the scale factor adjustment
Correlation coefficient
d Root mean square error
19
More intriguing information
1. Fiscal federalism and Fiscal Autonomy: Lessons for the UK from other Industrialised Countries2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. If our brains were simple, we would be too simple to understand them.
7. Co-ordinating European sectoral policies against the background of European Spatial Development
8. Fighting windmills? EU industrial interests and global climate negotiations
9. A Dynamic Model of Conflict and Cooperation
10. Herman Melville and the Problem of Evil