The Advantage of Cooperatives under Asymmetric Cost Information



A measure of the relative social loss from having an IO as opposed to an
CO processor could be

RSL ≈


f-h.(μl÷.,⅜     ( _ ^dCi


where the nominator is the social loss (from not producing when costs are
high) in the IO regime and the denominator is the total social gain available
(and realized by a cooperative). The relative social loss RSL as a function of
p is depicted in Figure 1 below when μi ≡≈ ε< = 1.

Fig 1.: Relative Social Loss from 10, μi — εi ≈= 1


A more detailed illustration of RSL is provided in Figure 2 where we assume
μi = ι.



More intriguing information

1. Stakeholder Activism, Managerial Entrenchment, and the Congruence of Interests between Shareholders and Stakeholders
2. Dynamiques des Entreprises Agroalimentaires (EAA) du Languedoc-Roussillon : évolutions 1998-2003. Programme de recherche PSDR 2001-2006 financé par l'Inra et la Région Languedoc-Roussillon
3. The name is absent
4. Artificial neural networks as models of stimulus control*
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Asymmetric transfer of the dynamic motion aftereffect between first- and second-order cues and among different second-order cues
8. The name is absent
9. LOCAL PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES TO HELP FARM PEOPLE ADJUST
10. Locke's theory of perception