Table 4: An identified long-run structure in β
The structure : β = (H1^1,..., Hrφr) , y2(10) = 9.19[0.51]
pp |
∙S12 |
∆p2 |
bɪ |
b2 |
∙⅜1 |
⅜ |
t91.1 |
t | |
~lfΓ |
—0.01 |
0.01 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
— 1.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
[-23.49] |
[23.49] |
[≡] |
[≡] |
[≡] |
[≡] |
[≡] |
[≡] |
[5.60] | |
β2 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.09 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
— 1.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
[≡] |
[6.32] |
[10.25] |
[≡] |
[≡] |
[≡] |
[≡] |
[4.36] |
[≡] | |
β,3 |
—0.01 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
—0.74 |
0.00 |
—0.00 |
0.00 |
[-5.51] |
[^A] |
[^A] |
[-16.48] |
[^A] |
[-4.83] |
[^A] | |||
ʌ |
—0.92 |
0.15 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.04 |
0.04 |
0.04 |
0.00 |
—0.01 |
δ2 |
—0.51 |
—0.17 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
0.03 |
0.02 |
0.00 |
—0.00 |
δ3 |
1.31 |
—0.07 |
—0.04 |
—0.04 |
—0.05 |
—0.06 |
—0.05 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
β ±1,1 |
1.00 |
0.35 |
11.71 |
— 1.62 |
— 1.62 |
15.80 |
—0.61 |
—0.00 |
0.00 |
β ±1,2 |
2.86 |
1.00 |
33.51 |
—4.67 |
—4.69 |
45.23 |
— 1.80 |
—0.01 |
0.01 |
9 Estimating the I(2) model subject to identifying
restrictions on the long-run structure
The decomposition τ = (β,β±1) defines three stationary polynomially cointegrating
relations, β'ixt+δ'i∆xt, i = 1, 2, 3 and five stationary cointegration relations between the
differenced variables, τ'∆xt. The difference between β'xt and β±1xt is that the latter
can only become stationary by differencing, whereas the former can become stationary
by polynomial cointegration. How to impose and test over-identifying restrictions on
β was discussed in Section 4, but not on β±1 or τ as their asymptotic distributions are
not yet worked out.
9.1 The estimated long-run structure
To obtain standard errors of the estimated β coefficients we need to impose identifying
restrictions on each of the polynomially cointegrating relations reported above. The
asymptotic distribution of an identified β is given in Johansen (1997).
When interpreting the β relations below we shall only include the first two el-
ements of δ'∆xt, corresponding to the inflation rate differentials and the deprecia-
tion∕appreciation rate, as they are likely to be more relevant than the other variables.
The first relation is approximately describing the relationship between long-term
interest rate spreads and ppp which have been found in many other VAR models of
similar data:
β,1xt + δ'1∆xt = {(b1 — 0.92∆p1) — (b2 — 0.92∆p2) + 0.15∆s12 — 0.01ppp + trend}. (22)
The second is a relation between the US term spread and US inflation relative to
German inflation. It can be interpreted as expected inflation, measured by the term
spread, as a function of actual inflation rates and the change in the Dιnk∕8 rate:
19
More intriguing information
1. Environmental Regulation, Market Power and Price Discrimination in the Agricultural Chemical Industry2. Poverty transition through targeted programme: the case of Bangladesh Poultry Model
3. Accurate and robust image superresolution by neural processing of local image representations
4. The name is absent
5. The Challenge of Urban Regeneration in Deprived European Neighbourhoods - a Partnership Approach
6. A Study of Adult 'Non-Singers' In Newfoundland
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. A Review of Kuhnian and Lakatosian “Explanations” in Economics
10. Linking Indigenous Social Capital to a Global Economy