The name is absent



As a starting point, Figure 4.11 provides a two-dimensional decomposition of the budget
balance. Vertically, the budget balance is decomposed into factors which are economy-
induced and those which are policy-induced. Horizontally, a distinction is made factors
with a temporary impact on the budget as opposed to those which have a permanent
impact.

Figure 4.11

Determinants of the Actual Budget Balance

Temporary        Permanent

Economy

A

C

Policy

B

D

Square A would thus includes factors related to the temporary state of the economy at
given tax and expenditure rules. An example would be unemployment benefit
expenditures and temporary higher/lower tax revenues due to tax bases being temporarily
higher/lower than their trend values or tax elasticities being temporarily higher/lower than
normal. Square B, includes, for example, temporary higher expenditures due to
discretionary stabilisation policy measures. Square C would capture, for example, how
potential GDP and demographic trends affect the budget balance permanently, while
square D includes the impact on the budget from permanent changes to tax and
expenditure rules.65

On this basis a comparison of the coverage of the authors decomposition can be made to
the coverage of the CAB in relation to the different budget concepts. This is done in
Table 4.2.

Table 4.2 What Do the Different Budget Indicators Capture?

Budget Concept

Determinants of budget
balance in Figure 4.11

Corresponding best to
which component in
authors decomposition:

Use of CAB
(or primary CAB)

Structural budget balance
(level)

C+D

Core component

CAB (B+C+D)

Fiscal stance (change)

B+C+D

Discretionary component

(B)

Change CAB (B+C+D)

Discretionary policy
(change)

B+D

Discretionary component
(B)

Change CAB (B+C+D)

Fiscal impulse (change)

A+B+C+D

(n.a. change nominal

________balance)________

(n.a. change nominal
________
balance)________

Let me go through the concepts in turn. First, if the aim is to capture the permanent
budget trend all temporary influences should be taken out. This would correspond to the
concept of a “structural budget balance” (C+D). The core component in the authors’
model would then seem most suitable to capture this. When the CAB on the other hand is

See also Braconier and Forsfalt (2004).

116



More intriguing information

1. The urban sprawl dynamics: does a neural network understand the spatial logic better than a cellular automata?
2. TRADE NEGOTIATIONS AND THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN AGRICULTURE
3. The Formation of Wenzhou Footwear Clusters: How Were the Entry Barriers Overcome?
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Models of Cognition: Neurological possibility does not indicate neurological plausibility.
7. Dual Inflation Under the Currency Board: The Challenges of Bulgarian EU Accession
8. A Study of Prospective Ophthalmology Residents’ Career Perceptions
9. The name is absent
10. New issues in Indian macro policy.
11. The role of statin drugs in combating cardiovascular diseases
12. EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES
13. The name is absent
14. The name is absent
15. Markets for Influence
16. SAEA EDITOR'S REPORT, FEBRUARY 1988
17. Empirically Analyzing the Impacts of U.S. Export Credit Programs on U.S. Agricultural Export Competitiveness
18. The Context of Sense and Sensibility
19. Iconic memory or icon?
20. The name is absent