|
Table 6.5 |
* General Government Net Borrowing/Lending, 2000-04 | ||||||||||||||||
|
_____________2000____________ |
_____________2001____________ |
_____________2002____________ |
_________2003________ |
2004 | |||||||||||||
|
2001 |
Spring of |
2004 |
2002 |
Spring of |
2005 |
2003 |
Spring of |
2006 |
2004 |
Spring of |
Spring of | ||||||
|
2005 |
2006 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Belgium |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
|
Denmark |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.6 |
2.6 |
2.7 |
3.1 |
3.1 |
3.2 |
1.9 |
1.7 |
1.7 |
1.2 |
1.5 |
1.2 |
1.0 |
2.8 |
2.7 |
|
Germany |
1.3 |
1.2 |
1.1 |
1.3 |
-2.7 |
-2.8 |
-2.8 |
-2.8 |
-3.6 |
-3.5 |
-3.7 |
-3.7 |
-3.9 |
-3.8 |
-4.0 |
-3.7 |
-3.7 |
|
Greece |
-0.9 |
-0.8 |
-1.9 |
-2.0 |
0.1 |
-1.4 |
-1.4 |
-3.6 |
-1.2 |
-1.4 |
-4.1 |
-4.9 |
-1.7 |
-5.2 |
-5.8 |
-6.1 |
-6.9 |
|
Spain |
-0.3 |
-0.3 |
-0.8 |
-0.9 |
0.0 |
-0.1 |
-0.4 |
-0.5 |
-0.1 |
0.0 |
-0.3 |
-0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
-0.3 |
-0.1 |
|
France |
-1.3 |
-1.3 |
-1.4 |
-1.4 |
-1.4 |
-1.5 |
-1.5 |
-1.5 |
-3.1 |
-3.2 |
-3.2 |
-3.2 |
-4.1 |
-4.2 |
-4.2 |
-3.7 |
-3.7 |
|
Ireland |
4.5 |
4.5 |
4.3 |
4.4 |
1.7 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
0.9 |
-0.1 |
-0.2 |
-0.4 |
-0.4 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
1.3 |
1.5 |
|
Italy |
-0.3 |
-0.5 |
-0.6 |
-0.6 |
-1.4 |
-2.6 |
-2.6 |
-3.0 |
-2.3 |
-2.3 |
-2.6 |
-2.9 |
-2.4 |
-2.9 |
-3.4 |
-3.0 |
-3.4 |
|
Luxembourg |
5.3 |
5.8 |
6.1 |
6.3 |
5.0 |
6.4 |
6.3 |
6.2 |
2.6 |
2.7 |
2.3 |
2.0 |
-0.1 |
0.5 |
0.2 |
-1.1 |
-1.1 |
|
Netherlands |
2.0 |
2.2 |
2.2 |
2.2 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
-0.1 |
-1.1 |
-1.9 |
-1.9 |
-2.0 |
-3.0 |
-3.2 |
-3.1 |
-2.5 |
-1.9 |
|
Austria |
-1.1 |
-1.5 |
-1.5 |
-1.5 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
-0.6 |
-0.2 |
-0.2 |
-0.5 |
-1.1 |
-1.1 |
-1.5 |
-1.3 |
-1.1 |
|
Portugal |
-1.4 |
-1.5 |
-2.8 |
-2.8 |
-2.2 |
-4.2 |
-4.4 |
-4.4 |
-2.7 |
-2.7 |
-2.7 |
-2.9 |
-2.8 |
-2.9 |
-2.9 |
-2.9 |
-3.2 |
|
Finland |
6.7 |
7.0 |
6.9 |
7.1 |
4.9 |
5.1 |
5.2 |
5.2 |
4.7 |
4.3 |
4.3 |
4.1 |
2.3 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.1 |
2.3 |
|
Sweden |
4.0 |
3.7 |
3.4 |
5.1 |
4.7 |
4.5 |
2.8 |
2.5 |
1.2 |
0.0 |
-0.3 |
-0.2 |
0.7 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
1.4 |
1.8 |
|
UK |
2.1 |
1.8 |
3.9 |
3.8 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
-1.4 |
-1.6 |
-1.7 |
-1.6 |
-3.2 |
-3.4 |
-3.3 |
-3.2 |
-3.3 |
|
Euro area ** |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
-1.3 |
-1.6 |
-1.6 |
-1.7 |
-2.3 |
-2.3 |
-2.4 |
-2.6 |
-2.7 |
-2.8 |
-3.1 |
-2.8 |
-2.9 |
|
Notes: * Spring notifications’ initial estimates and subsequent revisions (as a percentage of GDP). A negative sign indicates a deficit; a positive sign indicates a surplus. | |||||||||||||||||
UMTS proceeds are included.
** Excluding Greece in 2000.
More intriguing information
1. Self-Help Groups and Income Generation in the Informal Settlements of Nairobi2. Are Public Investment Efficient in Creating Capital Stocks in Developing Countries?
3. The name is absent
4. Can genetic algorithms explain experimental anomalies? An application to common property resources
5. Human Development and Regional Disparities in Iran:A Policy Model
6. The name is absent
7. Learning-by-Exporting? Firm-Level Evidence for UK Manufacturing and Services Sectors
8. Auction Design without Commitment
9. Evaluating Consumer Usage of Nutritional Labeling: The Influence of Socio-Economic Characteristics
10. Large-N and Large-T Properties of Panel Data Estimators and the Hausman Test