Table 3.3 (continued)
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 | ||
Country |
Measure |
€ billions |
FI as percent of PV_GDP and | ||||||||||||
Fiscal imbalance |
41.0 |
43.9 |
47.1 |
50.5 |
54.1 |
58.0 |
62.2 |
3.2 |
3.4 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
4.2 |
4.6 |
4.9 | |
Estonia |
Annual change |
- |
3.0 |
3.2 |
3.4 |
3.6 |
3.9 |
4.2 |
- |
31.1 |
31.9 |
32.9 |
33.8 |
34.6 |
35.5 |
Interest accrual |
- |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.1 |
1.2 |
1.3 |
1.4 |
- |
10.3 |
10.5 |
10.8 |
11.1 |
11.5 |
11.8 | |
Shift in projection window__________ |
- |
2.0 |
2.1 |
2.3 |
2.4 |
2.6 |
2.8 |
- |
20.8 |
21.4 |
22.0 |
22.6 |
23.2 |
23.7 | |
Fiscal imbalance |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 | |
Hungary |
Annual change |
- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Interest accrual |
- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 | |
Shift in projection window__________ |
- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 | |
Fiscal imbalance |
89.5 |
95.4 |
101.7 |
108.5 |
115.7 |
123.4 |
131.5 |
3.8 |
4.0 |
4.3 |
4.6 |
4.9 |
5.3 |
5.6 | |
Lithuania |
Annual change |
- |
5.9 |
6.3 |
6.8 |
7.2 |
7.7 |
8.1 |
- |
31.5 |
32.2 |
33.0 |
33.7 |
34.5 |
35.2 |
Interest accrual |
- |
2.1 |
2.3 |
2.4 |
2.6 |
2.8 |
2.9 |
- |
11.3 |
11.5 |
11.8 |
12.1 |
12.4 |
12.7 | |
Shift in projection window__________ |
- |
3.8 |
4.1 |
4.3 |
4.6 |
4.9 |
5.2 |
- |
20.2 |
20.7 |
21.2 |
21.7 |
22.1 |
22.5 | |
Fiscal imbalance |
68.1 |
72.3 |
76.8 |
81.6 |
86.7 |
92.0 |
97.7 |
4.9 |
5.2 |
5.6 |
6.0 |
6.3 |
6.8 |
7.2 | |
Latvia |
Annual change |
- |
4.2 |
4.5 |
4.8 |
5.1 |
5.4 |
5.6 |
- |
36.5 |
37.2 |
38.0 |
38.7 |
39.4 |
40.1 |
Interest accrual |
- |
1.6 |
1.7 |
1.8 |
1.9 |
2.1 |
2.2 |
- |
13.9 |
14.2 |
14.5 |
14.8 |
15.2 |
15.6 | |
Shift in projection window__________ |
- |
2.6 |
2.8 |
3.0 |
3.1 |
3.3 |
3.5 |
- |
22.6 |
23.0 |
23.4 |
23.8 |
24.2 |
24.6 | |
Fiscal imbalance |
18.7 |
19.3 |
19.9 |
20.5 |
21.1 |
21.7 |
22.4 |
12.8 |
13.1 |
13.4 |
13.7 |
14.0 |
14.4 |
14.7 | |
Malta |
Annual change |
- |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
- |
13.5 |
14.0 |
14.4 |
14.9 |
15.5 |
16.0 |
Interest accrual |
- |
0.4 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
- |
10.4 |
10.8 |
11.3 |
11.7 |
12.2 |
12.7 | |
Shift in projection window__________ |
- |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
- |
3.1 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
3.3 | |
Fiscal imbalance |
3,162.9 |
3,386.9 |
3,626.6 |
3,882.8 |
4,156.1 |
4,447.3 |
4,757.0 |
9.0 |
9.7 |
10.4 |
11.2 |
12.0 |
12.9 |
13.8 | |
Poland |
Annual change |
- |
224.0 |
239.7 |
256.2 |
273.3 |
291.2 |
309.7 |
- |
104.4 |
106.1 |
107.7 |
109.3 |
110.8 |
112.2 |
Interest accrual |
- |
75.3 |
80.6 |
86.3 |
92.4 |
98.9 |
105.8 |
- |
35.1 |
35.7 |
36.3 |
36.9 |
37.6 |
38.4 | |
Shift in projection |
- |
148.7 |
159.1 |
169.9 |
180.9 |
192.3 |
203.8 |
- |
69.3 |
70.4 |
71.4 |
72.3 |
73.1 |
73.9 |
More intriguing information
1. Technological progress, organizational change and the size of the Human Resources Department2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. The effect of classroom diversity on tolerance and participation in England, Sweden and Germany
6. Strategic Planning on the Local Level As a Factor of Rural Development in the Republic of Serbia
7. Gender stereotyping and wage discrimination among Italian graduates
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent