Table 2: Frequency of different types of reforms in different time periods
(see table 1 for sample definition)
Before 1980 |
Between 1980 and 1990 |
After 1990 | |
Labour |
0.1 |
0.24 |
0.38 |
Product |
0 |
0.16 |
0.62 |
Pension reforms |
n.a. |
0.16 |
0.31 |
Figures represent the ratio between the total number of cases in which reforms occurred over the total number of years for which
information is available on reform indicators. See Table 1 for the definition of reform indicators and for country/year availability.
Table 3: Rank correlation between indicators of labour market, product market and pension reforms across
the sample (see table 1 for sample definition)
Labour |
Labour |
Labour | |
Labour |
1 |
.. |
.. |
Product |
-0.01 |
1 |
.. |
Pension reforms |
0.02 |
0.14 |
1 |
Source: Authors’ calculation on data described in table 1
120
More intriguing information
1. TOWARDS THE ZERO ACCIDENT GOAL: ASSISTING THE FIRST OFFICER MONITOR AND CHALLENGE CAPTAIN ERRORS2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. The Role of area-yield crop insurance program face to the Mid-term Review of Common Agricultural Policy
7. Growth and Technological Leadership in US Industries: A Spatial Econometric Analysis at the State Level, 1963-1997
8. References
9. Optimal Vehicle Size, Haulage Length, and the Structure of Transport Costs
10. THE MEXICAN HOG INDUSTRY: MOVING BEYOND 2003