Table 4: Average changes in budgetary variables during reform periods and periods where no reform took
place: labour and product market reforms (see table 1 for sample definition)
Labour market reforms Product market reforms
Year-to-year change in |
No |
A reform took |
t test for |
No |
A reform took |
t test for |
Primary CAB |
0.06 |
0.08 |
-0.14 |
015 |
0.15 |
-0.0 |
Cyclically-adjusted |
0.43 |
0.3 |
0.65 |
0.54 |
0.01 |
2.89*** |
Social security contributions |
0.17 |
0.08 |
1.3 |
0.12 |
0.017 |
1.7* |
Primary expenditure |
0.38 |
0.19 |
0.93 |
0.36 |
-0.11 |
2.44** |
Social benefits other |
0.2 |
0.05 |
1.6 |
0.17 |
-0.005 |
1.97** |
Government subsidies |
-0.003 238 |
-0.048 114 |
0.85 |
-0.033 |
-0.072 |
0.79 |
Source: Authors’ calculation on data described in table 1 and DG ECFIN AMECO database.
122
More intriguing information
1. Housing Market in Malaga: An Application of the Hedonic Methodology2. The Role of Trait Emotional Intelligence (El) in the Workplace.
3. The name is absent
4. The Composition of Government Spending and the Real Exchange Rate
5. The name is absent
6. ISO 9000 -- A MARKETING TOOL FOR U.S. AGRIBUSINESS
7. The name is absent
8. Migration and Technological Change in Rural Households: Complements or Substitutes?
9. The name is absent
10. Novelty and Reinforcement Learning in the Value System of Developmental Robots