Table 6: Evolution of selected budgetary during structural pension reforms in the EU, 1986-1999
Pension |
Change in |
Change in social |
Change in social |
Germany 1992 |
1.7 |
1 |
1.4 |
Spain 1997 |
-0.1 |
0 |
-0.9 |
Italy 1992 |
1.1 |
-0.1 |
0.8 |
Italy 1995 |
3.1 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
Netherlands |
-1.4 |
-0.2 |
-1.8 |
1996 | |||
Portugal 1993 |
1.3 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
Finland 1997 |
0.8 |
-0.2 |
-1.7 |
Sweden 1998 |
-0.5 |
0.6 |
-1.2 |
UK 1987 |
0.4 |
-0.4 |
-1.8 |
Note: Including only structural reforms decreasing the generosity of the pension system as reported in the FRDB
database. Social benefit figures refer to the “social benefits other than in kind” category in the ESA95 government
accounts.
Source: authors’ computations on FRDB and AMECO databases
124
More intriguing information
1. The WTO and the Cartagena Protocol: International Policy Coordination or Conflict?2. Modelling the health related benefits of environmental policies - a CGE analysis for the eu countries with gem-e3
3. Implementation of a 3GPP LTE Turbo Decoder Accelerator on GPU
4. Migrant Business Networks and FDI
5. The name is absent
6. Response speeds of direct and securitized real estate to shocks in the fundamentals
7. Empirically Analyzing the Impacts of U.S. Export Credit Programs on U.S. Agricultural Export Competitiveness
8. Activation of s28-dependent transcription in Escherichia coli by the cyclic AMP receptor protein requires an unusual promoter organization
9. Do imputed education histories provide satisfactory results in fertility analysis in the Western German context?
10. CGE modelling of the resources boom in Indonesia and Australia using TERM