Table 6: Evolution of selected budgetary during structural pension reforms in the EU, 1986-1999
Pension |
Change in |
Change in social |
Change in social |
Germany 1992 |
1.7 |
1 |
1.4 |
Spain 1997 |
-0.1 |
0 |
-0.9 |
Italy 1992 |
1.1 |
-0.1 |
0.8 |
Italy 1995 |
3.1 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
Netherlands |
-1.4 |
-0.2 |
-1.8 |
1996 | |||
Portugal 1993 |
1.3 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
Finland 1997 |
0.8 |
-0.2 |
-1.7 |
Sweden 1998 |
-0.5 |
0.6 |
-1.2 |
UK 1987 |
0.4 |
-0.4 |
-1.8 |
Note: Including only structural reforms decreasing the generosity of the pension system as reported in the FRDB
database. Social benefit figures refer to the “social benefits other than in kind” category in the ESA95 government
accounts.
Source: authors’ computations on FRDB and AMECO databases
124
More intriguing information
1. Alzheimer’s Disease and Herpes Simplex Encephalitis2. Crime as a Social Cost of Poverty and Inequality: A Review Focusing on Developing Countries
3. LABOR POLICY AND THE OVER-ALL ECONOMY
4. The name is absent
5. 101 Proposals to reform the Stability and Growth Pact. Why so many? A Survey
6. The name is absent
7. A Pure Test for the Elasticity of Yield Spreads
8. The name is absent
9. Migration and Technological Change in Rural Households: Complements or Substitutes?
10. THE WAEA -- WHICH NICHE IN THE PROFESSION?