(a) 2 or more years after agoa
(b) 3 or more years after agoa
(c) 4 or more years after agoa
(d) 5 or more years after agoa
(e) 6 or more years after agoa
(f) 7 years after agoa
(g) 8 years after agoa
Figure 5: Precision vs. coefficient based on number of years after agoa
4 Results
Random Effects Meta-Analysis
In the analysis presented we excluded Mueller (2008) since it reported one coefficient and its inclusion did
affect results of the various MRAs. In addition, the coefficients from the first table of Tadesse, et al (2008)
were included in the analysis. The remaining tables in their paper reported similar (and in many case
the same) coefficients in Tadesse and Fayissa (2008). In two studies (Nouve and Staatz, 2003, Seyoum,
2007) probability values were reported instead of t-statistics or standard errors. Hence, the inverse of the
t-distribution was used to recover the t-statistics—the distribution of these imputed statistics are presented
More intriguing information
1. WP 36 - Women's Preferences or Delineated Policies? The development or part-time work in the Netherlands, Germany and the United Kingdom2. Creating a 2000 IES-LFS Database in Stata
3. Perceived Market Risks and Strategic Risk Management of Food Manufactures: Empirical Results from the German Brewing Industry
4. CAPACITAÇÃO GERENCIAL DE AGRICULTORES FAMILIARES: UMA PROPOSTA METODOLÓGICA DE EXTENSÃO RURAL
5. The name is absent
6. THE USE OF EXTRANEOUS INFORMATION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF A POLICY SIMULATION MODEL
7. Regional differentiation in the Russian federation: A cluster-based typification
8. The name is absent
9. Second Order Filter Distribution Approximations for Financial Time Series with Extreme Outlier
10. CHANGING PRICES, CHANGING CIGARETTE CONSUMPTION