is due to B3. Now suppose that x' ≥ y. Then ΓV(y) = C(y-x,y) + D(x) + δV(f(x)) ≤ C(0,y) + D(y) +
δV(f(y)) = C(0,y') + D(y) + δV(f(y)) ≤ C(y'-x',y') + D(x') + δV(f(x')). The first inequality is due to
optimality, the equality follows from B2, and the second inequality is implied by B3 and the fact that V is
nondecreasing. ■
Proof of Lemma 2. a. Let x e X(y) and x' e X(y') for y ≤ y'. Then max[x,x'] ≤ y' and min[x,x'] ≤ y.
Note that D(max[x,x']) + D(min[x,x']) = D(x) + D(x'), and likewise V(f(max[x,x']))+V(f(min[x,x'])) =
V(f(x))+V(f(x')). Since Caa(a,y) + Cay(a,y) ≥ 0 it follows that C(y-x,y) - C(y-min[x,x'],y) ≥
C(y'-max[x,x'],y') - C(y'-x',y'). Hence, 0 ≥C(y-x,y) + D(x) + δV(f(x)) - [C(y-min[x,x'],y) + D(min[x,x']) +
δV(f(min[x,x'])] ≥ C(y'-max[x,x'],y') + D(max[x,x']) + δV(f(max[x,x'])) - [C(y'-x',y') + D(x') + δV(f(x'))]
≥ 0, where the first and last inequalities follow from the principle of optimality. This sequence of
inequalities implies that min[x,x'] e X(y) and max[x,x'] e X(y'). If Caa(a,y) + Cay(a,y) > 0 the middle
inequality above becomes strict when x' < x. This yields a contradiction so it must be that every selection
from the optimal policy correspondence is monotone.
b. The argument is similar to the proof of part a. Let x e X(y) and x' e X(y') < y' for y ≤ y'. We want to
show that max[x,x'] e X(y) and min[x,x'] e X(y'). This follows immediately if x ≥ x' so suppose that
x < x'. Since x' < y' it must be the case that x' ≤ y for all y sufficiently close to y'. The assumption
Caa(a,y) + Cay(a,y) ≤ 0 implies C(y-x,y) + C(y'-x',y') ≥ C(y'-x,y') + C(y-x',y). This is turn yields 0 ≥
C(y-x,y) + D(x) + δV(f(x)) - [C(y-x',y) + D(x') + δV(f(x'))] ≥ C(y'-x,y') + D(x) + δV(f(x')) - [C(y'-x',y') +
D(x') + δV(f(x'))] ≥ 0, where the first and last inequalities follow from optimality. This sequence of
inequalities implies that x' e X(y) and x e X(y'). Hence max[x,x'] e X(y) and min[x,x'] e X(y'). The
assumption that X(y') < y' is necessary to insure that x' is feasible from y e N(y'). ■
22
More intriguing information
1. HOW WILL PRODUCTION, MARKETING, AND CONSUMPTION BE COORDINATED? FROM A FARM ORGANIZATION VIEWPOINT2. LIMITS OF PUBLIC POLICY EDUCATION
3. Dual Inflation Under the Currency Board: The Challenges of Bulgarian EU Accession
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Applications of Evolutionary Economic Geography
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. STIMULATING COOPERATION AMONG FARMERS IN A POST-SOCIALIST ECONOMY: LESSONS FROM A PUBLIC-PRIVATE MARKETING PARTNERSHIP IN POLAND
10. SOCIOECONOMIC TRENDS CHANGING RURAL AMERICA