The name is absent



Proof of Lemma 3. a. Without loss of generality we can take n = 0. Let {xt,at}, t = 0,... be optimal from
y0 = y. Suppose at = 0 for all t and xt = yt = ft(y). It follows that for all y
e (0,K), ft(y) e (0,K), ft(y) > y,
and ftx(y)
fx(K)t for all t 1. Consider

an alternative sequence {χt,at} where ao = ɛ and at = 0 for all t 1. Then xt = yt = ft(y-ε) for all t 1. As
{xt,at} is optimal,

0


δt {c(0,ft(y)) +D(ft(y))}
t=0


C(ε,y) + D(y-ε) + δt {c(0,ft(y ))+D(ft(y-ε))}
t=1

∞∞

= C(0,y) - C(ε, y) + δt [c(0, ft (y)) - C(0, ft (y - ε)) ] + ɪ δt [ D(ft (y)) - D(ft (y-ε)) ].

t=1                                              t=0

Dividing by ɛ and letting ε→0 implies: Ca(0,y) Dx(y) + δt [Cy(0,ft(y)) + Dχ(ft(y))ɔf3t(y).

t=1

Since Cy(0,ft(y)) = 0 this contradicts the condition of the proposition. Thus, there must exist some t for
which at > 0.

b. Let a0 denote the control that minimizes the sum of one-period control costs and damages. The
assumption Ca(0,y) < Dx(y) implies a0 > 0. Let a* denote an optimal control for the infinite horizon
problem. From the definition of a0, C(a0,y) + D(y-a0)
C(a*,y) + D(y-a*), with a strict inequality if a* =
0. Further, if a* < a0, then V(f(y-a*))
V(f(y-a0)) by Lemma 1. From these inequalities it must be that
a*
a0 > 0, else a* could not be optimal in the infinite horizon problem.

c. Since infa Ca(a,f(y)) + Cy(a,f(y)) Ca(0,f(y)) + Cy(0,f(y)) = Ca(0,f(y)) it follows from the condition in
part b that Ca(0,y) < Dx(y) + δCa(0,f(y))fχ(y) for all y. Since the condition is part c holds for all y,
C
a(0,f(y)) < Dχ(f(y)) + δ[infa {Ca(a,f2(y)) + Cy(a,f2(y))}]fχ(f(y)). Substituting this in the previous
inequality yields C
a(0,y) < Dχ(y) + δ[Dχ(f(y)) + δ[infa {Ca(a,f2(y)) + Cy(a,f2(y))}]fχ(f(y))]fχ(y). Iterating
forward and repeating a similar substitution yields Ca(0,y) < Dx(y) +

23



More intriguing information

1. Momentum in Australian Stock Returns: An Update
2. Educational Inequalities Among School Leavers in Ireland 1979-1994
3. Human Rights Violations by the Executive: Complicity of the Judiciary in Cameroon?
4. Literary criticism as such can perhaps be called the art of rereading.
5. The resources and strategies that 10-11 year old boys use to construct masculinities in the school setting
6. Modeling industrial location decisions in U.S. counties
7. Solidaristic Wage Bargaining
8. Economies of Size for Conventional Tillage and No-till Wheat Production
9. FOREIGN AGRICULTURAL SERVICE PROGRAMS AND FOREIGN RELATIONS
10. Licensing Schemes in Endogenous Entry