Table 5: Effect of CCFTA on Canadian Exports
OLS (1) |
FE (2) |
OLS (3) |
FE |
OLS (5) |
FE (6) | |
Chili Dummy |
0.1330 |
-0.2482* |
-0.0789 |
-0.0615 |
-0.0826 |
0.0333 |
(0.1583) |
(0.1415) |
(0.1261) |
(0.1034) |
(0.1694) |
(0.1363) | |
FTA dummy |
-0.1493 |
0.1250 |
0.1770 |
0.2079 |
0.0191 |
-0.0410 |
(0.1882) |
(0.1680) |
(0.1739) |
(0.1421) |
(0.2259) |
(0.1795) | |
%Δ(Exchange |
-0.0758 |
-0.1150*** | ||||
rate) |
(0.0531) |
(0.0425) | ||||
log(GDP) |
0.0357*** |
0.0412*** |
0.0297*** |
0.0342*** | ||
(0.0053) |
(0.0044) |
(0.0073) |
(0.0060) | |||
Furtalizer |
-0.0000 |
0.0000** |
0.0000 |
0.0000*** | ||
(0.0000) |
(0.0000) |
(0.0000) |
(0.0000) | |||
log(Ag. land) |
0.1581*** |
0.1197*** |
0.2072*** |
0.1581*** | ||
(0.0060) |
(0.0050) |
(0.0085) |
(0.0071) | |||
Ag. land per |
-11.2879*** |
-12.4622*** |
-15.9266*** |
-17.4019*** | ||
worker |
(0.8435) |
(0.6981) |
(1.3476) |
(1.0970) | ||
log(Distance) |
0.1229*** |
0.1241*** |
0.1832*** |
0.2067*** | ||
(0.0260) |
(0.0220) |
(0.0355) |
(0.0299) | |||
Common |
-0.0534 |
-0.1243*** |
0.0441 |
-0.0867** | ||
language |
(0.0351) |
(0.0294) |
(0.0511) |
(0.0424) | ||
Landlocked |
-0.2879*** |
-0.5439*** |
-0.4899*** |
-0.7542*** | ||
(0.0685) |
(0.0567) |
(0.1152) |
(0.0936) | |||
Island |
-0.5742*** |
-0.2177*** |
-0.6564*** |
-0.2383*** | ||
(0.0359) |
(0.0301) |
(0.0500) |
(0.0415) | |||
Constant |
10.7359*** |
10.7044*** |
7.9304*** |
7.9347*** |
7.6473*** |
7.6378*** |
(0.0386) |
(0.0346) |
(0.2273) |
(0.1938) |
(0.3097) |
(0.2628) | |
R2 |
0.0369 |
0.0278 |
0.1051 |
0.0830 |
0.1364 |
0.1041 |
N___________ |
126955 |
126955 |
35691 |
35691 |
18815 |
18815 |
Notes: The dependent variable is log of Canadian exports value (annual). Standard errors in
parentheses. Columns (2), (4) and (6) include industry fixed effects. All specifications include
time fixed effects.
26
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. The Employment Impact of Differences in Dmand and Production
4. The name is absent
5. The resources and strategies that 10-11 year old boys use to construct masculinities in the school setting
6. Discourse Patterns in First Language Use at Hcme and Second Language Learning at School: an Ethnographic Approach
7. A Regional Core, Adjacent, Periphery Model for National Economic Geography Analysis
8. Manufacturing Earnings and Cycles: New Evidence
9. CGE modelling of the resources boom in Indonesia and Australia using TERM
10. Demand Potential for Goat Meat in Southern States: Empirical Evidence from a Multi-State Goat Meat Consumer Survey