Table 3: Effect of CCFTA on Canadian Imports
OLS (1) |
FE (2) |
OLS (3) |
FE (4) |
OLS (5) |
FE (6) | |
Chili Dummy |
0.3304*** |
-0.1224 |
0.7257*** |
0.5845*** |
0.5802*** |
0.4070*** |
(0.1171) |
(0.1101) |
(0.1066) |
(0.0990) |
(0.1213) |
(0.1139) | |
FTA dummy |
0.3003** |
0.4682*** |
0.2172* |
0.2208*** |
0.2426 |
0.2935* |
(0.1493) |
(0.1394) |
(0.1257) |
(0.0856) |
(0.1823) |
(0.1666) | |
%Δ(Exchange |
0.0054 |
0.1384*** | ||||
rate) |
(0.0503) |
(0.0460) | ||||
log(GDP) |
-0.0491*** |
-0.0503*** |
-0.0348*** |
-0.0413*** | ||
(0.0068) |
(0.0064) |
(0.0078) |
(0.0073) | |||
Furtalizer |
0.0000*** |
0.0000*** |
0.0000*** |
0.0000*** | ||
(0.0000) |
(0.0000) |
(0.0000) |
(0.0000) | |||
log(Ag. land) |
0.1400*** |
0.1967*** |
0.1302*** |
0.1719*** | ||
(0.0082) |
(0.0077) |
(0.0093) |
(0.0088) | |||
Ag. land per |
13.3777*** |
2.8032* |
15.0397*** |
1.9755 | ||
worker |
(1.5690) |
(1.4932) |
(1.7283) |
(1.6654) | ||
log(Distance) |
-0.0604* |
-0.0637* |
-0.0976** |
-0.0766* | ||
(0.0364) |
(0.0347) |
(0.0408) |
(0.0394) | |||
Common |
-0.2123*** |
-0.1548*** |
-0.1859*** |
-0.1782*** | ||
language |
(0.0423) |
(0.0391) |
(0.0471) |
(0.0441) | ||
Landlocked |
-0.7447*** |
-0.7911*** |
-0.4669*** |
-0.5155*** | ||
(0.0868) |
(0.0802) |
(0.1052) |
(0.0983) | |||
Island |
-0.0610 |
0.0209 |
-0.0395 |
0.0504 | ||
(0.0463) |
(0.0427) |
(0.0515) |
(0.0481) | |||
Constant |
11.2851*** |
11.0899*** |
9.9688*** |
9.3612*** |
10.0655*** |
9.4268*** |
(0.0463) |
(0.0436) |
(0.3028) |
(0.2946) |
(0.3397) |
(0.3341) | |
R2 |
0.0189 |
0.0151 |
0.0405 |
0.0421 |
0.0432 |
0.0392 |
N |
119927 |
119927 |
39332 |
39332 |
29496 |
29496 |
Notes: The dependent variable is log of Canadian imports value (annual). Standard errors in
parentheses. Columns (2), (4) and (6) include industry fixed effects. All specifications include
time fixed effects.
24
More intriguing information
1. AGRICULTURAL TRADE LIBERALIZATION UNDER NAFTA: REPORTING ON THE REPORT CARD2. Emissions Trading, Electricity Industry Restructuring and Investment in Pollution Abatement
3. The name is absent
4. Commuting in multinodal urban systems: An empirical comparison of three alternative models
5. Auction Design without Commitment
6. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ALTERNATIVE ECONOMETRIC PACKAGES: AN APPLICATION TO ITALIAN DEPOSIT INTEREST RATES
7. The name is absent
8. AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE PRODUCTION EFFECTS OF ADOPTING GM SEED TECHNOLOGY: THE CASE OF FARMERS IN ARGENTINA
9. Julkinen T&K-rahoitus ja sen vaikutus yrityksiin - Analyysi metalli- ja elektroniikkateollisuudesta
10. The name is absent