characteristic polynomial rewitten as follows: Q(z)=(z- 1+η) z2 + ε(η)z + κ(η) = 0 whose coefficients
are linear with respect to η and are given by ε(η) = -(1 — η) — Gi < 0, κ(η) = ηa +(1 — η)Gι > 0 with
dε(η)∕dη > 0, dκ(η)∕dη< 0. Therefore Q(1) = 0 and Q(—1) = 0 correspond to equations 1 + ε + κ = 0,
1 — ε + κ = 0 respectively. In the rest of this section, I discuss the qualitatively local stability of the
system (23), (24), (25) by locating the line segment M0M1 in the (ε, κ) plane where Mη =(ε(η),κ(η))
and η ∈ (0,1]. For η = 0, the point M0 = (—1 — G1, G1) belongs to the straight line associated with
equation 1 + ε + κ = 0 and satisfying Q(1) = 0. For η = 1, the point Mi = (—Gi, a) is located anywhere
above the horizontal axis and to the left of the vertical axis.
Proposition 7 Under constant gain learning with h =1and 0 < Gi ≤ 1, the fol lowing two config-
urations occur; i) if a<1, then the non-trivial steady state is locally stable for any η ∈ (0, 1]; ii) if
a> 1, then the non-trivial steady state is locally stable for any η ∈ (0, eηH), undergoes a Hopf-Neimark
bifurcation at ен = (1 — Gi)/(a — Gi), and becomes locally unstable for any η ∈ (г/н, 1].
Proof. If0 < Gi ≤ 1, then M0 lies either anywhere between the points (—1, 0) and (—2, 1) or corresponds
to the point (—2, 1) on the line segment associated with equation 1+ε + κ =0.
i) If a< 1, then Mi lies below the horizontal line associated with κ =1east from M0 . For any
г ∈ (0, 1], eigenvalues z2, z3 are either complex conjugate with modulus less than 1, or real with identical
sign in the interval (—1,1). Since z1 = 1 — η < 1, then (k, w, r) is a sink. (see figure A2)
ii) If a> 1, then Mi lies above the horizontal line associated with κ = 1 northeast from M0 . Therefore
the line segment M0Mi lies above the straight line corresponding to the equation 1+ε+κ = 0, and crosses
the horizontal line κ = 1 at η = ηH. For any η ∈ (0,eH), eigenvalues z2, z3 are either complex conjugate
with modulus less than 1, or real with identical sign in the interval (—1, 1). Since zi =1— г<1, then,
(k, w, r) is a sink. At ен = (1 — G1)∕(a — Gi), eigenvalues z2, z3 are complex conjugate with modulus
equals to 1. For any η ∈ (ен, 1], eigenvalues z2, z3 are complex conjugate with modulus greater than 1.
Since zi = 1 — η < 1, then, (k, w, r) is a saddle. (see figure A5) ■
Proposition 8 If 0 < Gi ≤ 1, local stability under constant gain learning when h = 1 implies local
stability when h =0. However the reverse is not true.
Proof. If 0 < Gi ≤ 1, then local stability under constant gain learning when h = 1 requires according
to proposition 7 that a < 1 implying that a < 1 + Gi which is according to proposition 4 i) a necessary
condition for local stability under constant gain learning when h =0. However the reverse is not true
since condition a< 1+ Gi may imply a> 1 which is according to proposition 7 a necessary condition
for local instability under constant gain learning when h = 1. (see figures A2, A3) ■
Proposition 9 If 0 < Gi ≤ 1, and a > 1 + Gi, then the set of constant gain parameters η associated
with local stability is larger for h =0 than for h =1.
Proof. If 0 < Gi ≤ 1, and a > 1 + Gi, local stability under constant gain learning requires η ∈ (0,bF)
for h = 0, and η ∈ (0,ен) for h = 1 where bF = 2(1 + Gi)∕(1 + a + Gi) and ен = (1 — Gi)∕(a — Gi).
Under above conditions on parameters Gi, a, we can easily show that bF > ен. (see figure A4) ■
Proposition 10 Under constant gain learning with h = 1 and 1 < Gi < 1 + a, the following two
configurations occur; i) if a < 1, then the non-trivial steady state is locally unstable for any е ∈ (0, ен),
undergoes a Hopf-Neimark bifurcation at ен = (1 — Gi)∕(a — Gi), and becomes locally stable for any
е ∈ (ен, 1]; ii) if a > 1, then the non-trivial steady state is locally unstable stable for any е ∈ (0,1].
Proof. If 1 < Gi < 1 + a, then Mo lies anywhere between the points (—2,1) and (—2 — a, 1 + a) on the
line segment associated with equation 1+ε + κ =0.
i) If a< 1, then Mi lies south east from point M0 . Therefore the line segment M0 Mi lies above the
straight line corresponding to the equation 1 + ε + κ = 0, and crosses the horizontal line κ = 1 at е = e н.
For any е ∈ (0, ен), eigenvalues z2, z3 are either complex conjugate with modulus greater than 1, or real
with identical sign in the intervals (~∞, —1) or (1, ∞). Since z1 = 1 — е < 1, then, (k, w, r) is a saddle.
At ен = (1 — Gi)∕(a — Gi), eigenvalues z2, z3 are complex conjugate with modulus equals to 1. For
any е ∈ (ен, 1], eigenvalues z2, z3 are either complex conjugate with modulus less than 1, or real with
identical sign in the interval (—1, 1). Since zi = 1 — е < 1, then, (k, w, r) is a sink. (see figure A7)
10
More intriguing information
1. Commuting in multinodal urban systems: An empirical comparison of three alternative models2. Errors in recorded security prices and the turn-of-the year effect
3. The geography of collaborative knowledge production: entropy techniques and results for the European Union
4. Does South Africa Have the Potential and Capacity to Grow at 7 Per Cent?: A Labour Market Perspective
5. The name is absent
6. BODY LANGUAGE IS OF PARTICULAR IMPORTANCE IN LARGE GROUPS
7. Behavioural Characteristics and Financial Distress
8. Skill and work experience in the European knowledge economy
9. Economies of Size for Conventional Tillage and No-till Wheat Production
10. Solidaristic Wage Bargaining