γ =1, and a Cobb-Douglas production technology: F (Kt,EtNt)=Ktα (EtNt)1-α where α represents
the capital’s share with 0 <α<1. In order to make the balanced growth path of the model consistent
with the long-run characteristics for the U.S. Economy, I set the value for α to be equal to 0.4 which
corresponds to the standard labor-income share of 60%. The estimates for the yearly rate of growth for
the population and the labor augmenting technical progress over the sample period 1954-1992 are taken
from Cooley and Prescott (1995) and are equal to 0.012 and 0.0156 respectively. Following Cooley and
Prescott (1995), I use the law of motion for the capital stock and the first-order necessary condition for
consumption both evaluated at the permanent regime to pin down the values for δ and β. Since the law
of motion for the capital stock per capita in the steady state is given by: (1 + e) (1 + n) = (1 — δ) + i∕k,
and the yearly investment-capital ratio i∕k is equal to 0.076, then the resulting value for the yearly
depreciation rate for physical capital δ is equal to 0.048 under above specifications for n and e. The first-
order necessary condition for consumption per effective amount of labor evaluated in the steady state is:
(1 + e)γ (1 + n) = β (1 — δ + αy∕k). For a yearly capital-output ratio k∕y equals to 3.32, and a coefficient
of relative risk aversion γ equals to 1, the optimality condition for consumption is satisfied in the steady
state for a yearly discount factor β of 0.958. If we consider instead relative risk aversion coefficients of
0.02, 0.09, we get yearly discount factors of 0.944, 0.945 respectively. Table 1 in the appendix summarizes
in quarterly terms all the parameter values considered for the simulations. For a CRRA specification
of instantaneous preferences, the constrained utility maximizing problem under perfect foresight (8)
cannot be solved analytically, and the competitive equilibrium trajectories of the model are derived by
log-linearizing the households’ first-order necessary condition around the permanent regime as in King,
Plosser and Rebelo (1988). Under the bounded rationality hypothesis, the constrained planning problem
(18) can be solved analytically for any t ∈ Z+ ∪ {0}, and the utility maximizing consumption plans per
effective amount of labor are given by:
e =------^p1∖ 1√7-1)/7 £(1 + e)wγ1 + ρ1 (Wjt + (1 + rt) et)] (26)
1 + ^-1/Y (p1)(γ )/Y
e =-------ιz 1 1 a(7-1)/7 £e + p1 (Wt + (1 + rt) et)] (27)
1 + v-1h (p1)(γ )/Y
Using the parameter specifications of table 1, the model has a unique non-trivial steady state level of
physical capital per effective amount of labor k equals to 75.4963, and the corresponding value for G1 is
equal to 1 for h ∈ {0, 1}.
The case where h =0
If the constant gain adaptive learning schemes (24), (25) include current input prices: h =0,and
for G1 = 1, then according to proposition 4, the model with boundedly rational households can only
lose its stability through a Flip bifurcation. Using a total of 518, 400 distinct ordered pairs (1∕γ, η) ∈
[1.1, 100] ® [0.1, 1], figure 14A illustrates in the parameter space 1∕γ — η the local dynamic properties of
the competitive equilibrium trajectories where 1∕γ denotes the intertemporal elasticity of substitution be-
tween current and expected future consumption. The color codes used in computing this two-dimensional
bifurcation diagram are defined in figure 15A. For each ordered pair (1∕γ, η) considered, figure 14A is
obtained by simulating the model for a maximum of 10, 000 iterates and deleting the first 1, 000. Under
the assumption that γ = 0.02, the corresponding value for a is equal to 4.56187, and the first Flip bi-
furcation occurs at ηbF = 0.609583 according to proposition 4. For γ = 0.02, figure 16A illustrates the
local qualitative behavior of the model under 475 distinct values of the gain parameter η ranging from
0.05 to 1. In this one-dimensional bifurcation diagram, the competitive equilibrium tra jectory of physical
capital per capita has been computed for a total of 1, 000 iterates. The first 100 iterations have been
discarded, and the 900 remaining have been plotted vertically just above the corresponding value of η
represented along the horizontal axis. If η<ηbF , the plotted horizontal segment reveals that the physical
capital per effective amount of labor converges to the unique non-trivial stationary state k.Ifη ≥ bηF ,
the dynamic of physical capital per effective amount of labor alternates between cycles of every order or
irregular behavior. At η = 0.7, the largest Lyapunov exponent we get after 40, 000 iterates of the model
12
More intriguing information
1. Ultrametric Distance in Syntax2. The name is absent
3. EU enlargement and environmental policy
4. Parent child interaction in Nigerian families: conversation analysis, context and culture
5. The Value of Cultural Heritage Sites in Armenia: Evidence From a Travel Cost Method Study
6. The economic value of food labels: A lab experiment on safer infant milk formula
7. Konjunkturprognostiker unter Panik: Kommentar
8. Altruism with Social Roots: An Emerging Literature
9. Government spending composition, technical change and wage inequality
10. A simple enquiry on heterogeneous lending rates and lending behaviour