Expectation Formation and Endogenous Fluctuations in Aggregate Demand



The Evolution of Output and the Precision of Signals in Time when 2                               ψ a(1)>1+ ψ

0.53

0.525

0.52

0.515

0.51

0.505

0.5

0                   20                  40                  60                  80                  100                  120

time


0.08

0.07

0.06

0.05

0.04

0.03

0.02

0.01



0                   20                  40                  60                  80                  100                  120

time

Figure 6: The Evolution of Output when 2ψα (1) > 1 + ψ.

In summary, the economy does not settle into a steady state. The path
it follows is oscillatory and is chosen in equilibrium. Speci
fically, the form of
expectation formation is the key determinant of the path. The quality of sig-
nals purchased determines the size of the intertemporal errors. Moreover, it
de
fines the characteristic of the underlying equilibrium dynamic equation (33).
If agents choose to be relatively well informed,
qt close to one, then the coeffi-
cient in front of
Etxt+1 is less than one. This implies that the economy follows
a convergent, albeit oscillatory, path, which terminates in a stable, given a high
choice of
qt, steady state. However, if complete convergence were to occur priors
would become more informative. Speci
fically past realized values would have to
be close to the true realized value and the variance would become arbitrarily
small. Moreover, the quality of signals depends on the variance of the underlying
prior. Therefore, economic agents would stop learning as the priors would be
su
fficient to predict the future nearly with certainty and learning is costly. This,
however, would change the nature of the law of motion of variable
x . For qt
low enough, when there is no learning, the law of motion describes an explosive
path. Therefore, convergence would lead economic agents to choose not to learn,
but that would push the economy out of the convergence regime and would put
it on an explosive path into a divergence regime. This would, however, ruin
the informativeness of priors, their variance would increase, and would again
make agents learn. However, learning would again lead to convergence and the
cycle would repeat itself inde
finitely. In equilibrium the economy bounces back
and forth between two regimes. Economic agents either learn and this leads
to convergence or rely on past observations and this leads to divergence. In
equilibrium, the two regimes alternate.

24



More intriguing information

1. Does Market Concentration Promote or Reduce New Product Introductions? Evidence from US Food Industry
2. The effect of globalisation on industrial districts in Italy: evidence from the footwear sector
3. Economie de l’entrepreneur faits et théories (The economics of entrepreneur facts and theories)
4. The name is absent
5. The Mathematical Components of Engineering
6. DETERMINANTS OF FOOD AWAY FROM HOME AMONG AFRICAN-AMERICANS
7. Optimal Private and Public Harvesting under Spatial and Temporal Interdependence
8. A Review of Kuhnian and Lakatosian “Explanations” in Economics
9. Do imputed education histories provide satisfactory results in fertility analysis in the Western German context?
10. The name is absent
11. Rent Dissipation in Chartered Recreational Fishing: Inside the Black Box
12. Parent child interaction in Nigerian families: conversation analysis, context and culture
13. The name is absent
14. Migrating Football Players, Transfer Fees and Migration Controls
15. Benchmarking Regional Innovation: A Comparison of Bavaria, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland
16. The name is absent
17. Personal Income Tax Elasticity in Turkey: 1975-2005
18. The name is absent
19. Fiscal Policy Rules in Practice
20. Second Order Filter Distribution Approximations for Financial Time Series with Extreme Outlier