AN ANALYTICAL METHOD TO CALCULATE THE ERGODIC AND DIFFERENCE MATRICES OF THE DISCOUNTED MARKOV DECISION PROCESSES



and

Djki, k = 1, 2, 3, . . . , N, are constant factors different from zero.

Proof:

From linear algebra results, that the determinant of matrix (I - βP ) always exist,
it is bigger than zero and it is a polynomial of
N - degree. Each polynomial of N -
degree has exactly
N different real roots. Hence we can show det (I - βP ) in form
(16). Let prove (15) and write this formula in the following form:

[Dji (β )]  =  [⅞]  + jd⅛l ...JDNL

(17)


det (I βP)   (1 — α1β)   (1 — α2β)        (1 — αNβ)

This formula shows decomposition of the left side of dependence (17) into sum
of
N partial fractions. Such a decomposition is always possible. If we want to cal-
culate values of factors
Djki, k = 1, 2, 3, . . . , N, we should solve (N × N) systems
of equations:

Dji (β)
det (I βP)


D1      D2.           Dn          ___

(18)


--j— +--j— +  +--j-—  ij = 1 N
1 — αι β +1 — α2β +   +1 — αN β ,j ,

it means

Dji (β)    = Dji (1 — α2β) ... (1 — αNβ) + Dji (1 — α1β) (1 — α3β) . . .

det (I βP)                       det (I βP)

... (1 — αNβ) + ... + DjN (1 — αιβ) (1 — α2β)... (1 — αN-ιβ)
det (I βP)

After rejection of denominators of both sides we compare factors which stand in
front of the same powers
β, β0, β1 , . . . , βN-1 of the left and right side of nume-
rators.

So each element of matrix

[Dji (β)]   = Γ   Dji (β)

i,j = 1,N


det (I βP) det (I βP)



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. DISCUSSION: POLICY CONSIDERATIONS OF EMERGING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
3. The name is absent
4. An institutional analysis of sasi laut in Maluku, Indonesia
5. Qualifying Recital: Lisa Carol Hardaway, flute
6. Meat Slaughter and Processing Plants’ Traceability Levels Evidence From Iowa
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. How Offshoring Can Affect the Industries’ Skill Composition
10. Tobacco and Alcohol: Complements or Substitutes? - A Statistical Guinea Pig Approach