A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ALTERNATIVE ECONOMETRIC PACKAGES: AN APPLICATION TO ITALIAN DEPOSIT INTEREST RATES



ANN94 .2078109186   .0251020549   8.278641708   [.000]

ANN95 1.061031859   .0235980764   44.96264182   [.000]

Variance Components (random effects) Estimates:

VWITH (variance of Uit) = .34081

VBET (variance of Ai) = .42730
(computed from small sample formula)
THETA (0=WITHIN, 1=TOTAL) = .10229
(evaluated at TMAX = 7)

Dependent variable: RATE

Mean of dep. var. = 6.008486356

Std. dev. of dep. var. = 1.394531738

Sum of squared residuals = 6387.212931

Variance of residuals = .7755236682

Std. error of regression = .8806382164

R-squared = .6016887144

Adjusted R-squared = .6013018166

LM het. test = 98.56427090 [.000]

Durbin-Watson = .5944021688 [.000,.000]

Estimated Standard

Variable Coefficient Error t-statistic P-value

COSRAT 19.31537278   1.802406350   10.71643627   [.000]

NBANKS .9442362215E-02 .1018982787E-02 9.266459000   [.000]

ANN90

2.357793776

.0266570424

88.44918895

[.000]

ANN91

2.297395120

.0263338342

87.24119320

[.000]

ANN92

2.854901040

.0251893972

113.3374099

[.000]

ANN93

.8854899542

.0257697692

34.36157883

[.000]

ANN94

.1720995513

.0244361201

7.042834572

[.000]

ANN95

1.042947192

.0234800782

44.41838659

[.000]

C 3.920533084   .0558821081   70.15721522   [.000]

Hausman test of H0:RE vs. FE: CHISQ(8) = 72.034, P-value = [.0000]

Limdep Version 7.0 OUTPUT

+=======================================================================+
: LIMDEP Estimation Results

: Sample was reset SAMPLE 1-7165,7243-8322$:

: Current sample contains 8245 observations.:

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+

| OLS Without Group Dummy Variables                  |

| Ordinary least squares regression Weighting variable = ONE |

| Dependent variable is RATE Mean = 6.00849, S.D. =   1.3945 |

| Model size: Observations = 8245, Parameters = 9, Deg.Fr.= 8236 |
| Residuals: Sum of squares = 6326.1039, Std.Dev. =     .87642 |

| Fit: R-squared = .60541, Adjusted R-squared =     .60503 |

| Model test: F[ 8, 8236] = 1579.56, Prob value =     .00000 |

21



More intriguing information

1. Innovation Trajectories in Honduras’ Coffee Value Chain. Public and Private Influence on the Use of New Knowledge and Technology among Coffee Growers
2. The name is absent
3. Before and After the Hartz Reforms: The Performance of Active Labour Market Policy in Germany
4. Yield curve analysis
5. Literary criticism as such can perhaps be called the art of rereading.
6. PEER-REVIEWED FINAL EDITED VERSION OF ARTICLE PRIOR TO PUBLICATION
7. Voluntary Teaming and Effort
8. Innovation in commercialization of pelagic fish: the example of "Srdela Snack" Franchise
9. Impact of Ethanol Production on U.S. and Regional Gasoline Prices and On the Profitability of U.S. Oil Refinery Industry
10. Effects of red light and loud noise on the rate at which monkeys sample the sensory environment
11. Top-Down Mass Analysis of Protein Tyrosine Nitration: Comparison of Electron Capture Dissociation with “Slow-Heating” Tandem Mass Spectrometry Methods
12. Fiscal Rules, Fiscal Institutions, and Fiscal Performance
13. Estimating the Technology of Cognitive and Noncognitive Skill Formation
14. The name is absent
15. INTERACTION EFFECTS OF PROMOTION, RESEARCH, AND PRICE SUPPORT PROGRAMS FOR U.S. COTTON
16. The name is absent
17. The name is absent
18. The effect of classroom diversity on tolerance and participation in England, Sweden and Germany
19. Lumpy Investment, Sectoral Propagation, and Business Cycles
20. The name is absent