∣Φ(ωι)Φ(ω2)(α - ɑo) - Ωι (ωι) Φ(ω2)(l - Φ(ωι))(fc - ko
Ωi (ωι) Φ(ωι) [l - Φ(ω⅛)] - Ω2 (ω2) Φ(ωι) [l - Φ(ω2)]
(A4b)
Substitution of equations (A4b) into (A3b) and the resulting expressions into (A2a)-(A2d)
yield the stable solutions for (φ, a, μ, k) in the endogenous employment case.
5.3. Fixed Employment Equilibrium
If consumer-producers supply a fixed (unitary) level of work effort l = l, instantaneous
preferences reduce to U = U(c + a, s') + V(l), where the conditions (2.2)-(2.5) obtain.
Furthermore, we can simplify production technology to y = f (k), where y and k now
represent per-capita output and physical capital, respectively, and the following standard
restrictions on f (k) hold: f'(k) > 0, f "(k) < 0, f (0) = 0, f (0) = 0, f (k) → ∞ as k → ∞.
Furthermore, we assume the usual Inada conditions are satisfied. It is then straightforward
to demonstrate that the symmetric equilibrium in the fixed employment case corresponds
to:
Uc [c + α,s (l)] + Us [C + C’S (al)] S (l) = μ - Φ, (A5a)
φ = (β + δ)φ - Uc [c + a, s (l)] - Us [C + a+ (al)] S (l), (A5b)
a = c - δa, (A5c)
μ = μ[β - f '(k)], (A5d)
k = f (k) - c.
(A5e)
Equations (A5a)-(A5c) repeat (2.ll) and (2.lb) from the model with endogenous work
effort, while (A5d, e) are the corresponding differential equations for the capital stock and
its costate variable in the fixed employment case. As in the general model with endogenous
28
More intriguing information
1. Optimal Private and Public Harvesting under Spatial and Temporal Interdependence2. The name is absent
3. Existentialism: a Philosophy of Hope or Despair?
4. The name is absent
5. Auction Design without Commitment
6. The name is absent
7. Ex post analysis of the regional impacts of major infrastructure: the Channel Tunnel 10 years on.
8. Trade Openness and Volatility
9. The Role of State Trading Enterprises and Their Impact on Agricultural Development and Economic Growth in Developing Countries
10. Imputing Dairy Producers' Quota Discount Rate Using the Individual Export Milk Program in Quebec