employment, we calculate an instantaneous consumption function c = c (a, μ, φ) from
(A5a), which possesses the same partial derivatives stated above in (Ala).
The equilibrium dynamics of the fixed employment model then equals:
_4 .
φ = (l + β + δ) φ — μ,
(A6a)
a = c (a, μ, φ) — δa,
(A6b)
μ = μ[β — f '(к)]
(A6c)
к = f (к) — c(a,μ, φ~).
(A6d)
Letting φ = à = μ = к = 0, the long-run equilibrium equals
U [(ι + δ)α, s (l)] + u [(l+ ,δra,s (l)] g,(l)
(l + δ)a
, _ _ч -`
= (β + δ)φ,
(A7a)
f ' (a) = β
(A7b)
f (a) = δa,
(A7c)
where c = δa and μ = (l + β + δ) φ. Linearizing (A6a)-(A6d) about the steady-state
equilibrium described by (A7a)-(A7c), we obtain the following matrix differential equation:
z = Jz =
29
More intriguing information
1. DETERMINANTS OF FOOD AWAY FROM HOME AMONG AFRICAN-AMERICANS2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Indirect Effects of Pesticide Regulation and the Food Quality Protection Act
5. Asymmetric transfer of the dynamic motion aftereffect between first- and second-order cues and among different second-order cues
6. Income Mobility of Owners of Small Businesses when Boundaries between Occupations are Vague
7. The Role of State Trading Enterprises and Their Impact on Agricultural Development and Economic Growth in Developing Countries
8. Examining the Regional Aspect of Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries
9. Pricing American-style Derivatives under the Heston Model Dynamics: A Fast Fourier Transformation in the Geske–Johnson Scheme
10. The name is absent