.2 ρ(Xn) ∖ p(X) for Xn / X.
.3 ρ(λ1An ) ∖ ρ(λ) for λ > 0 whenever (1An )n is an isotone sequence of indicator mappings of subsets An ∈ F
∞
with U An = Ω.
n=1
Let us adapt Theorem 4.1 to the special situations of Remarks 3.4, 3.5.
Corollary 4.3 In the special context of Remark 3.4 with the notations introduced there all the statements .1 - .4
of Theorem 4.1 are equivalent.
Remark:
Corollary 4.3 generalizes a result for one-period positions (cf. [16], Theorem 1).
Remark 4.4 Let T = [0,T], C = R, let (Ft)t∈T be a filtration of σ-algebras on a set of scenarios Ω, and let X
be the set of cadlag positions. Then all statements .1 - .4 from Theorem 4.1 are equivalent, choosing L to be the
vector space spanned by the stochastic intervals [S, ∞[ (cf. Remark 3.5).
5 Robust representations of convex risk measures in presence of
given market models
Througout this section we assume that we have a market model with a reference probability measure P on a
σ-algebra F on the set of scenarios Ω. In the following we shall retain, and partly generalize, already known
results concerning the σ-additive robust representations of the convex risk measure ρ within the setting of a
market model. The point is that they may be derived from the results presented in the sections 1, 2 and 4. We
shall use the following notations. The spaces of P -integrable mappings of order p ∈ [1, ∞[ and P -essentially
bounded mappings will be denoted by Lp(Ω, F, P) and L∞(Ω,F, P) respectively. For p ∈ [1, ∞] the symbol
Lp(Ω,F,P) will be used for the space formed by identifying functions in Lp(Ω,F,P) that agree P —a.s.. The
equivalence class of any X ∈ Lp(Ω, F, P) will be indicated by < X > .
The first result may be found in [19] for π being the identity on R. Using Propostion 1.1, we obtain a slight
generalization.
Proposition 5.1 Let X = Lp(Ω, F, P) (p ∈ [1, ∞[) with conjugate space Lq(Ω, F, P). Furthermore let ρ(X) = ρ(Y)
for X = Y P a.s.. If M1(q) denotes the set of all Q ∈ M1 having some P —density from Lq(Ω, F, P), then
ρ(X) = max (—Eq[X] — αp(Q)) for all X ∈ Lp(Ω, F, P).
Q∈M1(q)
12
More intriguing information
1. The Challenge of Urban Regeneration in Deprived European Neighbourhoods - a Partnership Approach2. The name is absent
3. Activation of s28-dependent transcription in Escherichia coli by the cyclic AMP receptor protein requires an unusual promoter organization
4. MULTIPLE COMPARISONS WITH THE BEST: BAYESIAN PRECISION MEASURES OF EFFICIENCY RANKINGS
5. Regional science policy and the growth of knowledge megacentres in bioscience clusters
6. WP 48 - Population ageing in the Netherlands: Demographic and financial arguments for a balanced approach
7. Climate change, mitigation and adaptation: the case of the Murray–Darling Basin in Australia
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Changing spatial planning systems and the role of the regional government level; Comparing the Netherlands, Flanders and England