representable by a probability content if there is some probability content Q such that every X ∈ X is
integrable w.r.t. Q and Λ(X) = EQ [X].
If X is a Stonean vector lattice, then X ∧ Y = min{X, Y }, X ∨ Y = max{X, Y } ∈ X for X, Y ∈ X in particular
X+ := X ∨ 0, X- := (-X) ∨ 0 ∈ X for any X ∈ X. In this case, if all linear forms from the domain of βρ are
representable by probability contents, then ρ is concentrated on the bounded positions, and as a consequence ρ
admits a robust representation by probability measures if its restriction to the bounded positions does so.
Lemma 6.5 Let X be a Stonean vector lattice, and let every linear form Λ ∈ βρ-1 (R) be representable by some
probability content Q on σ(X). Then we can state:
.1 The sequence ρ(X+ - (X- ∧ n)) n converges to ρ(X) for every X ∈ X.
.2 The sequence ρ((X ∧ m) - Y ) m converges to ρ(X - Y ) for nonnegative X, Y ∈ X, Y being bounded.
.3 inf{∣ρ((X+ ∧ m) — (X- ∧ n)) — ρ(X)∣ ∣ m, n ∈ N} = 0 for X ∈ X, and in addition
sup (-EQ [X] - ρ(X)) = sup (-EQ [X] - ρ(X))
X∈X X∈Xb
for every probability content Q on σ(X) such that each X ∈ X is integrable w.r.t. Q .
.4 If M ⊆ αρ-1 (R) with ρ(X) = sup (—EQ [X] — αρ(Q)) for all bounded X ∈ X, then
Q∈M
ρ(X) = sup (—EQ [X] — αρ (Q)) for all X ∈ X.
Q∈M
Proof:
The most important tool of the proof is Greco’s representation theorem. The reader is kindly referred to [14]
(Theorem 2.10 with Remark 2.3).
Since any Λ ∈ βρ-1 (R) is representable by a probability content, statement .2 follows immediately from Greco’s
representation theorem and Lemma 6.4.
proof of .1:
Let X ∈ X, and let ε > 0. Then there exists some probability content Q with βρ(EQ |X) < ∞ such that the
inequality ρ(X) — ε < —EQ [X+] — βρ(EQ |X) + EQ [X-] holds. Application of Greco’s representation theorem leads
then to
ρ(X) — ε< -Eq[X+] — βρ(EQ∣X)+limEq[X- ∧ n] ≤ limρ(X+ — (X- ∧ n)) ≤ ρ(X)
nn
proof of .3:
Let Q be a probability content on σ(X) such that every X ∈ X is integrable w.r.t. Q, and let X ∈ X. Then for
ε > 0 we may choose by statement .1 and Greco’s representation theorem some n ∈ N with
∣ — Eq [X] — ρ(X) — '—Eq [X+ — (X- ∧ n)] — ρ(X+ — (X- ∧ n))´ ∣ < ɪ
17
More intriguing information
1. Optimal Rent Extraction in Pre-Industrial England and France – Default Risk and Monitoring Costs2. The economic value of food labels: A lab experiment on safer infant milk formula
3. FDI Implications of Recent European Court of Justice Decision on Corporation Tax Matters
4. Publication of Foreign Exchange Statistics by the Central Bank of Chile
5. Temporary Work in Turbulent Times: The Swedish Experience
6. Inflation and Inflation Uncertainty in the Euro Area
7. The name is absent
8. Knowledge and Learning in Complex Urban Renewal Projects; Towards a Process Design
9. Geography, Health, and Demo-Economic Development
10. Estimated Open Economy New Keynesian Phillips Curves for the G7