On s-additive robust representation of convex risk measures for unbounded financial positions in the presence of uncertainty about the market model



representable by a probability content if there is some probability content Q such that every X X is
integrable w.r.t. Q and Λ(
X) = EQ [X].

If X is a Stonean vector lattice, then X Y = min{X, Y }, X Y = max{X, Y } X for X, Y X in particular
X+ := X 0, X- := (-X) 0 X for any X X. In this case, if all linear forms from the domain of βρ are
representable by probability contents, then
ρ is concentrated on the bounded positions, and as a consequence ρ
admits a robust representation by probability measures if its restriction to the bounded positions does so.

Lemma 6.5 Let X be a Stonean vector lattice, and let every linear form Λ βρ-1 (R) be representable by some
probability content
Q on σ(X). Then we can state:

.1 The sequence ρ(X+ - (X- n)) n converges to ρ(X) for every X X.

.2 The sequence ρ((X m) - Y ) m converges to ρ(X - Y ) for nonnegative X, Y X, Y being bounded.

.3 inf{ρ((X+ m) (X- n)) ρ(X) m, n N} = 0 for X X, and in addition

sup (-EQ [X] - ρ(X)) = sup (-EQ [X] - ρ(X))
XX                   XXb

for every probability content Q on σ(X) such that each X X is integrable w.r.t. Q .

.4 If M αρ-1 (R) with ρ(X) = sup (EQ [X] αρ(Q)) for all bounded X X, then

Q∈M

ρ(X) = sup (EQ [X] αρ (Q)) for all X X.

Q∈M

Proof:

The most important tool of the proof is Greco’s representation theorem. The reader is kindly referred to [14]
(Theorem 2.10 with Remark 2.3).

Since any Λ βρ-1 (R) is representable by a probability content, statement .2 follows immediately from Greco’s
representation theorem and Lemma 6.4.

proof of .1:

Let X X, and let ε > 0. Then there exists some probability content Q with βρ(EQ |X) such that the
inequality
ρ(X) ε < EQ [X+] βρ(EQ |X) + EQ [X-] holds. Application of Greco’s representation theorem leads
then to

ρ(X) — ε< -Eq[X+] βρ(EQX)+limEq[X- n] limρ(X+ (X- n)) ρ(X)
nn

proof of .3:

Let Q be a probability content on σ(X) such that every X X is integrable w.r.t. Q, and let X X. Then for
ε > 0 we may choose by statement .1 and Greco’s representation theorem some n N with

— Eq [X] ρ(X) '—Eq [X+ (X- n)] ρ(X+ (X- n))´ < ɪ

17



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. An Interview with Thomas J. Sargent
3. Getting the practical teaching element right: A guide for literacy, numeracy and ESOL teacher educators
4. The name is absent
5. Ein pragmatisierter Kalkul des naturlichen Schlieβens nebst Metatheorie
6. Structure and objectives of Austria's foreign direct investment in the four adjacent Central and Eastern European countries Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Slovakia
7. Modelling the Effects of Public Support to Small Firms in the UK - Paradise Gained?
8. The name is absent
9. Insurance within the firm
10. Visual Perception of Humanoid Movement