On s-additive robust representation of convex risk measures for unbounded financial positions in the presence of uncertainty about the market model



representable by a probability content if there is some probability content Q such that every X X is
integrable w.r.t. Q and Λ(
X) = EQ [X].

If X is a Stonean vector lattice, then X Y = min{X, Y }, X Y = max{X, Y } X for X, Y X in particular
X+ := X 0, X- := (-X) 0 X for any X X. In this case, if all linear forms from the domain of βρ are
representable by probability contents, then
ρ is concentrated on the bounded positions, and as a consequence ρ
admits a robust representation by probability measures if its restriction to the bounded positions does so.

Lemma 6.5 Let X be a Stonean vector lattice, and let every linear form Λ βρ-1 (R) be representable by some
probability content
Q on σ(X). Then we can state:

.1 The sequence ρ(X+ - (X- n)) n converges to ρ(X) for every X X.

.2 The sequence ρ((X m) - Y ) m converges to ρ(X - Y ) for nonnegative X, Y X, Y being bounded.

.3 inf{ρ((X+ m) (X- n)) ρ(X) m, n N} = 0 for X X, and in addition

sup (-EQ [X] - ρ(X)) = sup (-EQ [X] - ρ(X))
XX                   XXb

for every probability content Q on σ(X) such that each X X is integrable w.r.t. Q .

.4 If M αρ-1 (R) with ρ(X) = sup (EQ [X] αρ(Q)) for all bounded X X, then

Q∈M

ρ(X) = sup (EQ [X] αρ (Q)) for all X X.

Q∈M

Proof:

The most important tool of the proof is Greco’s representation theorem. The reader is kindly referred to [14]
(Theorem 2.10 with Remark 2.3).

Since any Λ βρ-1 (R) is representable by a probability content, statement .2 follows immediately from Greco’s
representation theorem and Lemma 6.4.

proof of .1:

Let X X, and let ε > 0. Then there exists some probability content Q with βρ(EQ |X) such that the
inequality
ρ(X) ε < EQ [X+] βρ(EQ |X) + EQ [X-] holds. Application of Greco’s representation theorem leads
then to

ρ(X) — ε< -Eq[X+] βρ(EQX)+limEq[X- n] limρ(X+ (X- n)) ρ(X)
nn

proof of .3:

Let Q be a probability content on σ(X) such that every X X is integrable w.r.t. Q, and let X X. Then for
ε > 0 we may choose by statement .1 and Greco’s representation theorem some n N with

— Eq [X] ρ(X) '—Eq [X+ (X- n)] ρ(X+ (X- n))´ < ɪ

17



More intriguing information

1. Evaluation of the Development Potential of Russian Cities
2. The name is absent
3. Ability grouping in the secondary school: attitudes of teachers of practically based subjects
4. Lumpy Investment, Sectoral Propagation, and Business Cycles
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. On Social and Market Sanctions in Deterring non Compliance in Pollution Standards
9. Non-causality in Bivariate Binary Panel Data
10. Elicited bid functions in (a)symmetric first-price auctions