On s-additive robust representation of convex risk measures for unbounded financial positions in the presence of uncertainty about the market model



representable by a probability content if there is some probability content Q such that every X X is
integrable w.r.t. Q and Λ(
X) = EQ [X].

If X is a Stonean vector lattice, then X Y = min{X, Y }, X Y = max{X, Y } X for X, Y X in particular
X+ := X 0, X- := (-X) 0 X for any X X. In this case, if all linear forms from the domain of βρ are
representable by probability contents, then
ρ is concentrated on the bounded positions, and as a consequence ρ
admits a robust representation by probability measures if its restriction to the bounded positions does so.

Lemma 6.5 Let X be a Stonean vector lattice, and let every linear form Λ βρ-1 (R) be representable by some
probability content
Q on σ(X). Then we can state:

.1 The sequence ρ(X+ - (X- n)) n converges to ρ(X) for every X X.

.2 The sequence ρ((X m) - Y ) m converges to ρ(X - Y ) for nonnegative X, Y X, Y being bounded.

.3 inf{ρ((X+ m) (X- n)) ρ(X) m, n N} = 0 for X X, and in addition

sup (-EQ [X] - ρ(X)) = sup (-EQ [X] - ρ(X))
XX                   XXb

for every probability content Q on σ(X) such that each X X is integrable w.r.t. Q .

.4 If M αρ-1 (R) with ρ(X) = sup (EQ [X] αρ(Q)) for all bounded X X, then

Q∈M

ρ(X) = sup (EQ [X] αρ (Q)) for all X X.

Q∈M

Proof:

The most important tool of the proof is Greco’s representation theorem. The reader is kindly referred to [14]
(Theorem 2.10 with Remark 2.3).

Since any Λ βρ-1 (R) is representable by a probability content, statement .2 follows immediately from Greco’s
representation theorem and Lemma 6.4.

proof of .1:

Let X X, and let ε > 0. Then there exists some probability content Q with βρ(EQ |X) such that the
inequality
ρ(X) ε < EQ [X+] βρ(EQ |X) + EQ [X-] holds. Application of Greco’s representation theorem leads
then to

ρ(X) — ε< -Eq[X+] βρ(EQX)+limEq[X- n] limρ(X+ (X- n)) ρ(X)
nn

proof of .3:

Let Q be a probability content on σ(X) such that every X X is integrable w.r.t. Q, and let X X. Then for
ε > 0 we may choose by statement .1 and Greco’s representation theorem some n N with

— Eq [X] ρ(X) '—Eq [X+ (X- n)] ρ(X+ (X- n))´ < ɪ

17



More intriguing information

1. Fertility in Developing Countries
2. The name is absent
3. Social Irresponsibility in Management
4. CHANGING PRICES, CHANGING CIGARETTE CONSUMPTION
5. Do Decision Makers' Debt-risk Attitudes Affect the Agency Costs of Debt?
6. What Lessons for Economic Development Can We Draw from the Champagne Fairs?
7. Can genetic algorithms explain experimental anomalies? An application to common property resources
8. Modellgestützte Politikberatung im Naturschutz: Zur „optimalen“ Flächennutzung in der Agrarlandschaft des Biosphärenreservates „Mittlere Elbe“
9. The name is absent
10. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS' WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR REAL-TIME MESOSCALE WEATHER INFORMATION