On the Existence of the Moments of the Asymptotic Trace Statistic



where W(s) is a d-dimensional standard Brownian motion with d = K - r. Note that (2) is
the limiting null distribution of the trace statistic (LR statistic) for a given individual
i, i.e.
of
-T jK=r+1 ln(1 - bλij); see, e.g., Johansen (1995).

Under the null hypothesis and assuming suitable conditions, Larsson et al. (2001) applied
a central limit theorem to establish the asymptotic normality of their standardized LR-bar
statistic, so that standard normal quantiles may serve as critical values for the test. Moreover,
they approximated the first two moments of the asymptotic trace statistic
Zd for different
values
d by simulation as sample moments of

ZT,d = tr


1 T             1 T               -1

T ∑εtX0-1 T2 Σx<-1 Xt-1
t=1               t=1


1T

T X Xt-1 εt

t=1


(3)


where εt ~ Nd(0, Id) i.i.d. and Xt = Pt =1 εi for t = 1,..., T. This is motivated by the weak
convergence of
ZT,d to Zd as T → ∞. Consequently, the proposed procedure relies crucially
on the fact that the first two moments of the asymptotic trace statistic exist and may be
obtained as limits of the corresponding moments of
ZT,d.


2 Results


On account of the weak convergence of ZT,d to the asymptotic trace statistic Zd , the first two
moments of
Zd exist if the sequence {ZT2,d} is uniformly integrable. A sufficient condition for
this is established in Lemma 2, which states that the fourth moments of
ZT,d are uniformly
bounded in
T. We start with showing that all moments of ZT,d exist. To ensure that the
inverted matrix appearing in (3) is nonsingular with probability one, we assume
T > d.


Lemma 1. Assume that T > d. Then all moments of ZT,d defined by (3) exist.


Proof. As Larsson et al. (2001), we introduce the (T × d) matrices ε
and X = (X1, X2, ..., XT)0 as well as the (T × T) matrices


(ε1, ε2, ..., εT)0


10


and


..... 0 ^

..... 0

0   ■■■ 0


0  10


Then, X = and the (d × d) matrices appearing in (3) can be rewritten as


1T                  1

AT := T2 Σ<Xt-1 Xt-1 = T2ε A B BAε,
t=1


1T             1

Bt := T ΣX-1 ^t = TεA'B'ε.

t=1


(4)


Defining D = BA and Y = , we obtain therefore


ZT,d = tr(BT0 AT-1BT) = tr[ε0(ε0D0)-1ε0D0ε]
= tr(
ε0PYε) tr(ε0ε),


(5)

(6)


where PY = Y (Y0Y )-1Y0 denotes the projection matrix onto the column space of Y . The
assumption
εt ~ Nd (0 ,Id ) i.i.d. now implies tr( ) = P T=x ε'tεt ~ χ Td, which completes the
proof, since all moments of a
χ2-distributed random variable exist.                       ¥




More intriguing information

1. Prizes and Patents: Using Market Signals to Provide Incentives for Innovations
2. The name is absent
3. New issues in Indian macro policy.
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Visual Artists Between Cultural Demand and Economic Subsistence. Empirical Findings From Berlin.
7. Managing Human Resources in Higher Education: The Implications of a Diversifying Workforce
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent
11. Effects of red light and loud noise on the rate at which monkeys sample the sensory environment
12. Economic Evaluation of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), CHERE Working Paper 2007/6
13. Ultrametric Distance in Syntax
14. Institutions, Social Norms, and Bargaining Power: An Analysis of Individual Leisure Time in Couple Households
15. The name is absent
16. ADJUSTMENT TO GLOBALISATION: A STUDY OF THE FOOTWEAR INDUSTRY IN EUROPE
17. The name is absent
18. Philosophical Perspectives on Trustworthiness and Open-mindedness as Professional Virtues for the Practice of Nursing: Implications for he Moral Education of Nurses
19. The name is absent
20. The name is absent