as the inverse of a tridiagonal Minkowski matrix (see Neumann, 2000, and Yueh, 2006), i.e.
/ |
T— |
1 |
T— |
2 |
T— |
3 ... |
2 |
1 |
/ |
—1 |
1 |
0 .. |
.0 |
0 |
ʌ |
T1 | ||
T— |
2 |
T— |
2 |
T— |
3 ... |
2 |
1 |
1 |
—2 |
1 .. |
.0 |
0 | ||||||
-*⅛ |
T— |
3 |
T— |
3 |
T— |
3 ... |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
—2 .. |
.0 |
0 | |||||
F1 = |
. . |
. . |
. . |
. . . |
. . |
. . |
= ( -1) |
. . |
. . |
.. . |
. . .. |
. . | ||||||
. 2 |
. 2 |
. 2 |
... |
. 2 |
. 1 |
. 0 |
. 0 |
0 .. |
. —2 |
. 1 | ||||||||
1V |
1 |
1 |
1 |
... |
1 |
1 |
1V |
0 |
0 |
0 .. |
.1 |
—2 |
Using Theorem 2 of Yueh (2005), the positive (ordered) eigenvalues of F can
as
be represented
λt=
21
-----7------^-τ for t = 1,..., T — 1.
cos (%⅛) , ,
The series expansion of the cosine function provides, for a fixed m ∈ {1, . . . , T — 1} and as
T→∞,
1—
(2m
cos 2T
11)π =
(2m — 1)2π2
2(2T - 1)2
+ o(T-3)
and therefore
T2 __(2m
λm T→∞
1)2π2
=: c1 < ∞.
(11)
Note that, for fixed m and T → ∞, λm is of the same order T 2 as the sum of all eigenvalues
of F , since PtT=1 λt = tr(F) = T (T - 1)/2.
With the notation εt = (εt1, . . . , εtd)0, the last term in inequality (7) may be written as
tr(BT BT0 )
1 dd
T2 tr( ε,D,εε,Dε ) = ΣΣαi2j , where
(12)
TT
αij
T∑ ∑ εjti<-
=1 t=s+1
To prove (i), we first take the second power in (7) and apply the Cauchy-Schwarz in-
equality, which gives
E(ZT,d) ≤ E £tr(AT 1)tr(BtBt)]2 ≤ ©E[tr(AT 1)]4 E[tr(BtBt)]4}1 /2 . (13)
Consequently, it suffices to verify that both expectations on the right-hand side of inequality
(13) are uniformly bounded in T > d.
In view of (12), E[tr(BT BT0 )]4 is uniformly bounded in T if, for i, j ∈ {1, . . . , d},
supT E(α8j) < ∞. But this follows from εt ~ N(0,Id) i.i.d. and
E ( α8 ¢ = ɪ ∑...∑ ∑ ... ∑ E ( εs ι j ...εs 8 j εt ι i ...εt 8 i )
1 =1
8=1t1=s1+1 t8=s8+1
because E (εs1j . . . εs8jεt1i . . .εt8i ) = 0 if more than eight of the subscripts s1, . . . , s8, t1, . . . , t8
differ.