Tables
Table 1: Parameter Calibration for the Benchmark Model
Parameter |
Value United ________States________ |
Value Germany | |
relative risk aversion |
γ |
2 (1, 3) |
2 (1, 3) |
subjective discount factor |
δ |
0.97 (0.95, 0.99) |
0.97 (0.95, 0.99) |
United States Life Tables 2003 |
Life Table for | ||
survival probability |
pt |
Germany | |
marginal tax rate |
Rt |
0% |
0% |
expected return |
E(Rt) |
1.1151 |
1.1264 |
standard deviation of return |
Std(Rt) |
0.1996 |
0.2792 |
risk-free return |
Rf |
1.0361 |
1.0472 |
Inflation |
π |
0.0310 |
0.0279 |
Log-normal labor income |
Lt | ||
expected growth rates during |
life-cycle-income |
life-cycle-income | |
work life |
profile |
profile | |
expected real growth rates during |
0 |
0 | |
replacement factor |
35% |
40% | |
standard deviation during |
0.19 ∙ E(Lt) |
0.05 ∙ E(Lt) | |
standard deviation during retirement_____________________ |
0 |
0 |
42
More intriguing information
1. Reversal of Fortune: Macroeconomic Policy, International Finance, and Banking in Japan2. The Trade Effects of MERCOSUR and The Andean Community on U.S. Cotton Exports to CBI countries
3. CONSIDERATIONS CONCERNING THE ROLE OF ACCOUNTING AS INFORMATIONAL SYSTEM AND ASSISTANCE OF DECISION
4. Word searches: on the use of verbal and non-verbal resources during classroom talk
5. The name is absent
6. Momentum in Australian Stock Returns: An Update
7. DISCUSSION: ASSESSING STRUCTURAL CHANGE IN THE DEMAND FOR FOOD COMMODITIES
8. The name is absent
9. Luce Irigaray and divine matter
10. How we might be able to understand the brain