The name is absent



the progenitors, the higherthe long-run share ofthe population trapped
in povertyand in nonτ-qμalι...crtιon;;

2 a reduction in Ihecostofeducatiori, ceteris paribus> impiies an increase
i n ∈qμi ty and i n aggregate ∈¢ dency al owing the whɔe population to
qualify and implying an increase in the mean wealth and in aggregate
utility. In thatcase the long-run distribution does notdependon initial
conditions;

2 ceteris paribus the mcste3 Qentcynasties would be worse op cUe to
thereduction in thecostofeducationi whichmeans adecreasein human
capitaland a decrease in quali.ed people’s income.

M ultipeec∣ui Hbriaresultingfrom the...rstsG≡narioarethesaιτιeasG abr
andZ eira's andO wɪm andW eH lss andean interpretdinerentcros&countries
cynιaτics in the distribution efineoτe and wealth. I n fact diπ erent cross-
country performances may be explained by diπ erent initial conditions. A
country characterized by a more equal distribution and a higher level of
average wealth may take of and converge to a high long run equi iibrium,
whereas acountrywith averyunequaldistribution and alowlevelofaverage
wealth would inevitably be trapped in poverty and non-quali.cation.

As faras scenarioIII is concerned, descendants from non-quali.ed work-
ers and entrepreneurs remain in the progenitors' educational and occupa-
tional categories. O nly quali.ed entrepreneurs characterized by technical
in∈C dency lower than
e = (1 + h) ix(1—°)+h remain in this category En-
q                          q        q 1 qK (1—°)

treɔreneurs with a degree ofineXaency such thate °eq decumulate
wealth and cannotaf ord education anymore in the long-run, becomingnon-
quali.ed workers. D ynasties descending from quali.ed workers experience
only downward mobility as faras education is concerned.

The long-run occupationaldistribution is summarized in T able 5.

N Q

Q

marg, distr.

W

0:69 !

0:73

0:01238 !   0

0:70238 !   0:73

E

0:21 !

0:21

0:08762 !   0:06

0:29762 !   0.27

marg. distr.

0:9 !

0:94

0 :1 !   0 :06

1

G IN I =

0:263 !

0:332

T able 5: evolution of occupational distribution in scenario II I (progenitors !long-run) .

19



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Ultrametric Distance in Syntax
3. Better policy analysis with better data. Constructing a Social Accounting Matrix from the European System of National Accounts.
4. An Estimated DSGE Model of the Indian Economy.
5. The Prohibition of the Proposed Springer-ProSiebenSat.1-Merger: How much Economics in German Merger Control?
6. Change in firm population and spatial variations: The case of Turkey
7. Qualifying Recital: Lisa Carol Hardaway, flute
8. The name is absent
9. The Social Context as a Determinant of Teacher Motivational Strategies in Physical Education
10. CONSUMER PERCEPTION ON ALTERNATIVE POULTRY