Table 5: Determinants of academic performance: panel estimates
Equation |
OLS (1) |
F.E. (1) |
R.E. (1) |
OLS (2) |
F.E. (2) |
R.E. (2) |
Lectures |
0.053 |
0.026 |
0.051 | |||
( 2.763) |
( 1.198) |
( 2.777) | ||||
Classes |
0.052 |
0.037 |
0.050 |
0.029 |
0.029 |
0.030 |
( 4.522) |
( 2.828) |
( 4.248) |
( 2.054) |
( 1.804) |
( 2.148) | |
Adjusted R2 |
0.308 |
0.295 |
0.321 |
0.310 |
0.039 |
0.324 |
Note: Dependent variable: test score. t-statistics reported in brackets (robust
standard errors). Number of observations: 2896. All specifications include time
fixed effects and dummy variables for high school type, education and occupation
for both father and mother, and province of residence.
Breusch-Pagan LM test statistic (OLS(1) against RE(1)): 89.23 (p-value: 0.00).
(OLS(2) against RE(2)): 86.84 (p-value: 0.00) Hausman test statistic (RE(1) against
FE(1): 2.16 (p-value: 0.99), (RE(2) against FE(2): 30.23 (p-value: 0.01).
See section 3 for details on the definition and construction of regressors.
26
More intriguing information
1. Modellgestützte Politikberatung im Naturschutz: Zur „optimalen“ Flächennutzung in der Agrarlandschaft des Biosphärenreservates „Mittlere Elbe“2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Do imputed education histories provide satisfactory results in fertility analysis in the Western German context?
6. Higher education funding reforms in England: the distributional effects and the shifting balance of costs
7. Foreign Direct Investment and the Single Market
8. Towards a framework for critical citizenship education
9. The name is absent
10. Fiscal Rules, Fiscal Institutions, and Fiscal Performance