Table 5: Determinants of academic performance: panel estimates
Equation |
OLS (1) |
F.E. (1) |
R.E. (1) |
OLS (2) |
F.E. (2) |
R.E. (2) |
Lectures |
0.053 |
0.026 |
0.051 | |||
( 2.763) |
( 1.198) |
( 2.777) | ||||
Classes |
0.052 |
0.037 |
0.050 |
0.029 |
0.029 |
0.030 |
( 4.522) |
( 2.828) |
( 4.248) |
( 2.054) |
( 1.804) |
( 2.148) | |
Adjusted R2 |
0.308 |
0.295 |
0.321 |
0.310 |
0.039 |
0.324 |
Note: Dependent variable: test score. t-statistics reported in brackets (robust
standard errors). Number of observations: 2896. All specifications include time
fixed effects and dummy variables for high school type, education and occupation
for both father and mother, and province of residence.
Breusch-Pagan LM test statistic (OLS(1) against RE(1)): 89.23 (p-value: 0.00).
(OLS(2) against RE(2)): 86.84 (p-value: 0.00) Hausman test statistic (RE(1) against
FE(1): 2.16 (p-value: 0.99), (RE(2) against FE(2): 30.23 (p-value: 0.01).
See section 3 for details on the definition and construction of regressors.
26
More intriguing information
1. The use of formal education in Denmark 1980-19922. Bargaining Power and Equilibrium Consumption
3. The East Asian banking sector—overweight?
4. The Impact of Cognitive versus Affective Aspects on Consumer Usage of Financial Service Delivery Channels
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. How Offshoring Can Affect the Industries’ Skill Composition
8. Voluntary Teaming and Effort
9. Picture recognition in animals and humans
10. Land Police in Mozambique: Future Perspectives