Simulation B
Steady negative growth rate of 2.4% per year (0.6% per quarter) for all the commodities.
|
Table 10 - |
Lombardy | ||
|
Time |
PPH |
PPH% vs. |
average % decrease |
|
0 |
0.854 |
-14.55 |
n.a. |
|
1 |
0.853 |
-14.72 |
0.20 |
|
2 |
0.851 |
-14.88 |
0.39 |
|
3 |
0.850 |
-15.04 |
0.58 |
|
4 (year 1) |
0.848 |
-15.20 |
0.76 |
|
5 |
0.846 |
-15.36 |
0.94 |
|
6 |
0.845 |
-15.51 |
1.12 |
|
7 |
0.843 |
-15.66 |
1.29 |
|
8 (year 2) |
0.842 |
-15.80 |
1.46 |
|
9 |
0.841 |
-15.95 |
1.63 |
|
10 |
0.839 |
-16.09 |
1.79 |
|
11 |
0.838 |
-16.22 |
1.95 |
|
12 (year 3) |
0.836 |
-16.36 |
2.11 |
|
Legenda: | |||
|
PPH% vs. |
average = percentage variance of the functioning from national average | ||
|
% decrease |
= percentage decrease of the functioning over the time horizon | ||
|
Table 11 - |
Emilia Romagna | ||
|
Time |
PPH |
PPH% vs. |
average % decrease |
|
0 |
1.018 |
1.77 |
n.a. |
|
1 |
1.017 |
1.73 |
0.04 |
|
2 |
1.017 |
1.69 |
0.08 |
|
3 |
1.017 |
1.66 |
0.11 |
|
4 (year 1) |
1.016 |
1.63 |
0.14 |
|
5 |
1.016 |
1.61 |
0.16 |
|
6 |
1.016 |
1.58 |
0.18 |
|
7 |
1.016 |
1.57 |
0.20 |
|
8 (year 2) |
1.016 |
1.55 |
0.21 |
|
9 |
1.015 |
1.54 |
0.23 |
|
10 |
1.015 |
1.53 |
0.23 |
|
11 |
1.015 |
1.53 |
0.24 |
|
12 (year 3) |
1.015 |
1.53 |
0.24 |
22
More intriguing information
1. The changing face of Chicago: demographic trends in the 1990s2. The name is absent
3. Research Design, as Independent of Methods
4. Draft of paper published in:
5. The name is absent
6. Disturbing the fiscal theory of the price level: Can it fit the eu-15?
7. Economie de l’entrepreneur faits et théories (The economics of entrepreneur facts and theories)
8. Name Strategy: Its Existence and Implications
9. The name is absent
10. A Note on Productivity Change in European Co-operative Banks: The Luenberger Indicator Approach