Table 16 - Campania
|
Time |
PPH |
PPH% vs. average % increase | |
|
0 |
0.570 |
-43.04 |
n.a. |
|
1 |
0.571 |
-42.95 |
0.16 |
|
2 |
0.571 |
-42.85 |
0.33 |
|
3 |
0.572 |
-42.76 |
0.50 |
|
4 (year 1) |
0.573 |
-42.66 |
0.68 |
|
5 |
0.574 |
-42.56 |
0.86 |
|
6 |
0.575 |
-42.45 |
1.04 |
|
7 |
0.577 |
-42.35 |
1.22 |
|
8 (year 2) |
0.578 |
-42.24 |
1.41 |
|
9 |
0.579 |
-42.13 |
1.61 |
|
10 |
0.580 |
-42.02 |
1.80 |
|
11 |
0.581 |
-41.90 |
2.00 |
|
12 (year 3) |
0.582 |
-41.79 |
2.21 |
Simulation D
Steady negative growth rate of 2.4% per year (0.6% per quarter) for all the commodities.
Table 17 - Lombardy
|
Time |
PPH |
PPH% vs. average % decrease | |
|
0 |
0.710 |
-29.00 |
n.a. |
|
1 |
0.709 |
-29.09 |
0.13 |
|
2 |
0.708 |
-29.18 |
0.25 |
|
3 |
0.707 |
-29.26 |
0.37 |
|
4 (year 1) |
0.707 |
-29.35 |
0.49 |
|
5 |
0.706 |
-29.43 |
0.61 |
|
6 |
0.705 |
-29.51 |
0.72 |
|
7 |
0.704 |
-29.58 |
0.82 |
|
8 (year 2) |
0.703 |
-29.65 |
0.93 |
|
9 |
0.703 |
-29.73 |
1.03 |
|
10 |
0.702 |
-29.79 |
1.12 |
|
11 |
0.701 |
-29.86 |
1.22 |
|
12 (year 3) |
0.701 |
-29.92 |
1.30 |
Legenda:
PPH% vs. average = percentage variance of the functioning from national average
% decrease = percentage decrease of the functioning over the time horizon
25
More intriguing information
1. Categorial Grammar and Discourse2. The name is absent
3. The Prohibition of the Proposed Springer-ProSiebenSat.1-Merger: How much Economics in German Merger Control?
4. Life is an Adventure! An agent-based reconciliation of narrative and scientific worldviews
5. Evaluating Consumer Usage of Nutritional Labeling: The Influence of Socio-Economic Characteristics
6. Solidaristic Wage Bargaining
7. The name is absent
8. Robust Econometrics
9. The name is absent
10. DISCRIMINATORY APPROACH TO AUDITORY STIMULI IN GUINEA FOWL (NUMIDA MELEAGRIS) AFTER HYPERSTRIATAL∕HIPPOCAMP- AL BRAIN DAMAGE