Table 20 - Lombardy: SE vs. PE indicators
|
Time |
PPH SE |
PPH PE |
SE/PE |
|
0 |
0.854 |
0.710 |
20.28 |
|
1 |
0.856 |
0.711 |
20.39 |
|
2 |
0.858 |
0.712 |
20.51 |
|
3 |
0.860 |
0.713 |
20.62 |
|
4 (year 1) |
0.861 |
0.714 |
20.59 |
|
5 |
0.863 |
0.715 |
20.70 |
|
6 |
0.865 |
0.716 |
20.81 |
|
7 |
0.867 |
0.717 |
20.92 |
|
8 (year 2) |
0.869 |
0.718 |
21.03 |
|
9 |
0.871 |
0.719 |
21.14 |
|
10 |
0.873 |
0.721 |
21.08 |
|
11 |
0.875 |
0.722 |
21.19 |
|
12 (year 3) |
0.877 |
0.723 |
21.30 |
|
Legenda: PPH SE = |
PPH with socio-economic indicators of commodities | ||
|
PPH PE = |
PPH with public expenditure indicators of commodities | ||
|
SE/PE = percentage variation between PPH SE and PPH PE | |||
|
Table 21 - |
Emilia Romagna: SE vs. |
PE indicators | |
|
Time |
PPH SE |
PPH PE |
SE/PE |
|
0 |
1.018 |
0.944 |
7.84 |
|
1 |
1.018 |
0.944 |
7.84 |
|
2 |
1.019 |
0.944 |
7.94 |
|
3 |
1.019 |
0.945 |
7.83 |
|
4 (year 1) |
1.020 |
0.945 |
7.94 |
|
5 |
1.020 |
0.945 |
7.94 |
|
6 |
1.021 |
0.946 |
7.93 |
|
7 |
1.021 |
0.946 |
7.93 |
|
8 (year 2) |
1.022 |
0.947 |
7.92 |
|
9 |
1.023 |
0.947 |
8.03 |
|
10 |
1.024 |
0.948 |
8.02 |
|
11 |
1.024 |
0.949 |
7.90 |
|
12 (year 3) |
1.025 |
0.949 |
8.01 |
27
More intriguing information
1. Survey of Literature on Covered and Uncovered Interest Parities2. The voluntary welfare associations in Germany: An overview
3. How does an infant acquire the ability of joint attention?: A Constructive Approach
4. Proceedings from the ECFIN Workshop "The budgetary implications of structural reforms" - Brussels, 2 December 2005
5. Midwest prospects and the new economy
6. Revisiting The Bell Curve Debate Regarding the Effects of Cognitive Ability on Wages
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Cancer-related electronic support groups as navigation-aids: Overcoming geographic barriers
10. AGRICULTURAL TRADE IN THE URUGUAY ROUND: INTO FINAL BATTLE