Table 20 - Lombardy: SE vs. PE indicators
|
Time |
PPH SE |
PPH PE |
SE/PE |
|
0 |
0.854 |
0.710 |
20.28 |
|
1 |
0.856 |
0.711 |
20.39 |
|
2 |
0.858 |
0.712 |
20.51 |
|
3 |
0.860 |
0.713 |
20.62 |
|
4 (year 1) |
0.861 |
0.714 |
20.59 |
|
5 |
0.863 |
0.715 |
20.70 |
|
6 |
0.865 |
0.716 |
20.81 |
|
7 |
0.867 |
0.717 |
20.92 |
|
8 (year 2) |
0.869 |
0.718 |
21.03 |
|
9 |
0.871 |
0.719 |
21.14 |
|
10 |
0.873 |
0.721 |
21.08 |
|
11 |
0.875 |
0.722 |
21.19 |
|
12 (year 3) |
0.877 |
0.723 |
21.30 |
|
Legenda: PPH SE = |
PPH with socio-economic indicators of commodities | ||
|
PPH PE = |
PPH with public expenditure indicators of commodities | ||
|
SE/PE = percentage variation between PPH SE and PPH PE | |||
|
Table 21 - |
Emilia Romagna: SE vs. |
PE indicators | |
|
Time |
PPH SE |
PPH PE |
SE/PE |
|
0 |
1.018 |
0.944 |
7.84 |
|
1 |
1.018 |
0.944 |
7.84 |
|
2 |
1.019 |
0.944 |
7.94 |
|
3 |
1.019 |
0.945 |
7.83 |
|
4 (year 1) |
1.020 |
0.945 |
7.94 |
|
5 |
1.020 |
0.945 |
7.94 |
|
6 |
1.021 |
0.946 |
7.93 |
|
7 |
1.021 |
0.946 |
7.93 |
|
8 (year 2) |
1.022 |
0.947 |
7.92 |
|
9 |
1.023 |
0.947 |
8.03 |
|
10 |
1.024 |
0.948 |
8.02 |
|
11 |
1.024 |
0.949 |
7.90 |
|
12 (year 3) |
1.025 |
0.949 |
8.01 |
27